SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Raj) 1153

SANGEET LODHA
Balu Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:I.R. Choudhary, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has questioned legality of the Report submitted by the Enquiry Officer, the Additional Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Chittorgarh, holding the petitioner guilty of the charges of misconduct levelled against him vide charge sheet dated 13.2.14 issued by the Divisional Commissioner, Udaipur, in exercise of the power conferred under Section 38 of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 (for short "the Act") and Rule 22(2) of Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Rules, 1996 (for short "the Rules"). The petitioner has also questioned legality of the charge sheet issued as aforesaid and the order dated 15.9.14 issued by the Divisional Commissioner, Udaipur, appointing the Additional Chief Executive Officer as an Enquiry Officer to inquire into the charges of misconduct levelled against him.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner having come to know about the pattas being issued to the ineligible persons, the same were cancelled by a resolution adopted by the Gram Panchayat and thus, it cannot be said that the petitioner has caused any wrongful loss to the Gram Panchayat. Learned counsel submitted that rely





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top