SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Raj) 1223

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Sangeet Lodha, J.
Smt. Reena Kanwar Parmar - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan and Ors. - Respondent
S.B.Civil Writ Petition No. 105 of 2015.
Decided On : 16-01-2015

Advocates:
For the Petitioner:P.S. Chundawat, Advocate.
For the Respondent No. 1:S.R. Paliwal, Advocate.
For the Respondents: O.P. Boob, Government counsel.

Headnote:Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 226 – Writ petition filed – The petitioner’s caste certificate, issued in her favour, was cancelled by the authorities without giving her a reasonable opportunity to be heard – The court held that the authorities violated the principles of natural justice and didn’t follow the procedure as per law – Relying on of 2009 (9) SCC 187, the court allowed the writ petition and ordered for cancellation of orders of respondent authorities.

JUDGMENT

1. - With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is finally heard at this stage.

2. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has questioned the legality of order dated 30.12.14 passed by the Nayab Tehsildar, Jalore whereby the OBC Certificate issued in favour of the petitioner stands cancelled.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the certificate issued in favour of the petitioner has been cancelled by the Nayab Tehsildar by passing a cryptic order without giving any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner which is violative of principles of natural justice. In support of the contention, learned counsel has relied upon a decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Rampal v. State of Haryana and Ors., (2009) 9 SCC 187 .

4. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the petitioner does not belong to the caste "Rajput Parmar" and therefore, she was not entitled to be issued the certificate of OBC category. Learned counsel submitted that the rectification of the order is always permissible and therefore, the order passed by the Nayab Tehsildar, Jalore cannot be faulted with. However, it is not disputed by the learned counsel that the order impugned has been passed by the authority concerned without giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

5. I have considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties.

6. Admittedly, before cancelling the caste certificate issued in favour of the petitioner, the authority concerned has not given an opportunity of hearing to her. In the considered opinion of this Court, before cancelling the OBC certificate issued in favour of the petitioner, the respondent authority was under an obligation to give an opportunity of hearing. Thus, the order impugned passed by the respondent authority is violative of principles of natural justice and deserves to be quashed.

7. As a matter of fact, the controversy raised stands covered by the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Rampal's case (supra).

8. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is allowed. The order passed by the Nayab Tehsildar cancelling the OBC certificate issued in favour of the petitioner is quashed. Needless to say that the authority concerned shall be at liberty to pass an appropriate order afresh after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. No order as to costs.Petition Allowed.

*******



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top