RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT AT JAIPUR BENCH
V.K.Singhal, J.
JKS Employees’ Welfare Fund - Appellant
Versus
Income - Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6999 of 1991.
Decided On : 27-03-1992
INCOME TAX - SECTION 143(1)(A) - SECTION 167B - SUMMARY ASSESSMENT - JURISDICTION OF INCOME TAX OFFICER - POWER TO MAKE ADJUSTMENTS - SCOPE - DISALLOWANCE OF DEDUCTIONS, ALLOWANCES, ETC. - CONDITIONS - APPLICATION OF MAXIMUM MARGINAL RATE OF TAX - WHETHER PERMISSIBLE - HELD, NO
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner challenged the intimation received under section 143(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, whereby the petitioner was required to make payment of a sum of Rs. 20,243. The grievance of the petitioners was that the Income-tax Officer has no jurisdiction under section 143(1)(a) of the Act to make variation in the rate of tax and has limited jurisdiction as provided in the said section.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the Income-tax Officer has limited jurisdiction under section 143(1)(a) of the Act to make adjustments in the return filed by the assessee. The power to make adjustments is limited to arithmetical errors, loss carried forward, deduction, allowance or relief which is prima facie inadmissible. The application of the maximum marginal rate of tax is not covered by any of these exceptions and hence, the Income-tax Officer was not justified in sending intimation creating the demand by applying a provision the application of which itself was a disputed one.
Issues: Whether the Income-tax Officer has jurisdiction under section 143(1)(a) of the Act to make variation in the rate of tax?
Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted the provisions of section 143(1)(a) of the Act and held that the power of the Income-tax Officer to make adjustments is limited to arithmetical errors, loss carried forward, deduction, allowance or relief which is prima facie inadmissible. The application of the maximum marginal rate of tax is not covered by any of these exceptions and hence, the Income-tax Officer was not justified in sending intimation creating the demand by applying a provision the application of which itself was a disputed one.
Final Decision: The court quashed the intimation sent by the Income-tax Officer and directed him to proceed in accordance with law by providing an opportunity to the assessee and then frame the assessment under section 143(3) of the Act.
"143. Assessment. (1) (a) Where a return has been made under section 139, or in response to a notice under sub-section (1) of section 142,-
(i) if any tax or interest is found due on the basis of such return, after adjustment of any tax deducted at source or any advance tax paid and any amount paid otherwise by way of tax or interest, then, without prejudice to the provisions of subsection (2), an intimation shall be sent to the assessee specifying the sum so payable, and such intimation shall be deemed to be a notice of demand issued under section 156 and all the provisions of this Act shall apply accordingly ; and
(ii) if any refund is due on the basis of such return, it shall be granted to the assessee:
Provided that in computing the tax or interest payable by, or refundable to, the assessee, the following adjustments shall be made in the income or loss declared in the return, namely:-
(i) any arithmetical errors in the return, accounts or documents accompanying it shall be rectified ;
(ii) any loss carried forward, deduction, allowance or relief, which, on the basis of the information available in such return, accounts or documents, is prima facie admissible but which is not claimed in the return, shall be allowed ;
(iii) any loss carried forward, deduction, allowance or relief claimed in the return which, on the basis of the information available in such return, accounts or documents, is prima facie inadmissible, shall be disallowed:
Provided further that where adjustments are made under the first proviso, an intimation shall be sent to the assessee, notwithstanding that no tax or interest is found due from him after making the said adjustments;
Provided also that an intimation for any tax or interest due under this clause shall not be sent after the expiry of two years from the end of the assessment year in which the income was first assessable. "
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.