1992 Supreme(Raj) 600
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Milap Chandra, V.K.Singhal, JJ.
Commissioner of Income - Appellant
Versus
Gandhi Metals Mills (P) Ltd. - Respondent
D. B. Income-tax Reference No. 14 of 1985.
Decided On : 11-03-1992
Interest paid to directors on their deposits in running accounts is disallowable to the extent prescribed under section 40A(8) of the Income-tax Act.
Headnote:
{'KEYWORD': 'Income Tax', 'SUBJECT': 'Disallowance of Interest Paid to Directors on Deposits in Running Accounts', 'ACT SECTION LIST': ['Section 40A(8) of the Income-tax Act'], 'SUMMARY': 'The court held that interest paid to directors on their deposits in running accounts is disallowable to the extent prescribed under section 40A(8) of the Income-tax Act. The court interpreted the term "deposit" in section 40A(8) to include any deposit of money with, and any money borrowed by, a company, and found that the amount deposited by a director in the company\'s current account was a deposit within the meaning of the section.'}
Fact of the Case:
The Income-tax Officer disallowed interest paid to directors on their current accounts maintained with the company under section 40A(8) of the Income-tax Act. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) deleted the disallowance, and the Tribunal held that the interest was not disallowable under section 40A(8).
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the Tribunal was not legally justified in holding that the interest paid to the directors on their deposits in running accounts was not disallowable to the extent prescribed under section 40A(8) of the Act.
Issues: Whether the interest paid to the directors on their deposits in running accounts was disallowable to the extent prescribed under section 40A(8) of the Income-tax Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted the term "deposit" in section 40A(8) to include any deposit of money with, and any money borrowed by, a company. The court found that the amount deposited by a director in the company's current account was a deposit within the meaning of the section, and that the interest paid on the deposit was therefore disallowable under section 40A(8).
Final Decision: The court answered the reference in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee, holding that the Tribunal was not legally justified in holding that the interest paid to the directors on their deposits in running accounts was not disallowable to the extent prescribed in section 40A(8) of the Act.
"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was legally justified in holding that the interest paid to the directors on their deposits in running accounts was not disallowable to the extent prescribed under section 40A(B) of the Act? "
(8) Where the assessee, being a company (other than a banking company or a financial company), incurs any expenditure by way of interest in respect of any deposit received by it, fifteen per cent. of such expenditure shall not be allowed as deduction.
Explanation. In this sub-section,
(b) 'deposit' means any deposit of money with, and includes any money borrowed by, a company, but does not include any amount received by the company-
(i) from the Central Government or any State Government or any local authority, or from any other source where the repayment of the amount is guaranteed by the Central Government or by a State Government;
(ii) from the Government of a foreign State, or from a citize