SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Raj) 1909

M.N.BHANDARI
Mohanlal Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Anoop Dhand, Advocate.
For the State: Sudesh Saini, Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT

1. - By this criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., a challenge is made to the FIR No.298/2001, registered with Police Station Gandhi Nagar, Jaipur for the offence under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC.

2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a 'Will' was executed by Achraj Devi in favour of Ram Prasad and on his death, to Smt. Shimla Devi. The petitioner along with Madan Lal were the witnesses to the Will. The allegation exists regarding creation of fraudulent Will to grab the property of Smt. Achraj Devi. It is alleged that on the death of Ram Prasad, the property had come to Smt. Shimla Devi. The petitioner was only a witness to the Will and in no manner a beneficiary in the property. No proceedings were initiated against other witness Madan Lal. In view of the above, the FIR registered against him deserve to be set aside. It is more so when a civil suit for the property and for cancellation of the Will is pending in the Civil Court. The remedy having availed before the Civil Court and looking to the nature of the case and the role assigned to the petitioner, the FIR registered against him deserves to be quashed.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has o







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top