SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Raj) 1379

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT AT JAIPUR BENCH
R.S.Chauhan, Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, JJ.
Arvind Kumar @ Nemichand - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan - Respondent
D.B. Cr. Appeal No.449 of 1990 ; S.B. Criminal Appeal No.523 of 1991.
Decided On : 18-02-2015

For the Accused-Appellants:A.K. Gupta with Mr. Udit Purohit and Chandrakala, Advocates.
For the State: N.S. Dhakad, Public Prosecutor.
For the Complainant:V.R. Bajwa, Advocate.
For the Respondents in State Appeal:Biri Singh, Senior Counsel with Rajesh Choudhary, Advocate.

Headnote:Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 Section 374 Indian Penal Code, 1860 Sections 323, 302 read with 149, 148, 448 and 447 Appeal was filed against the conviction of the appellants – Prosecution has shown that from the initiation of the complaint there were many innocent persons named in the case – PW5 had named 13 persons but additionally he also mentioned 13 other and un-identified persons also – Mr Arvind Kumar and one another named to have been committed the overt act but as it came to Mr Birju the names of the persons were different – Held in case of different names and not reliable evidence the court is empowered to dismiss the petition by Arvind Kumar and provide a benefit of doubt to Mr Birju.

JUDGMENT

1. -Aggrieved by the judgment dated 16.11.1990, passed by the Court of Sessions, Sikar, the accused-appellants, Arvind Kumar @ Nemichand, Surja Ram @ Surajmal, Ramnarayan, Birbal, Birju @ Brij Mohan have approached this court by filing D. B. Criminal Appeal No.449/1990. Meanwhile, aggrieved by the same judgment, the State of Rajasthan has filed D. B. Criminal Appeal No.523/1991. Since both these appeals arise out of the same impugned judgment, they are being decided by this common judgment.

2. By the said judgment the learned Judge had convicted and sentenced the accused appellants as under:

Arvind Kumar @ Nemichand, Surja Ram @ Surajmal, Ramnarayan, Birbal and Birju @ Brij Mohan were convicted for offences under Sections 148, 448 IPC. Arvind Kumar @ Nemichand and Surja Ram @ Surajmal were substantively convicted for offence under Section 302 IPC; Ramnarayan, Birbal and Birju @ Brij Mohan were convicted for offence under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC. By a separate order of even date appellants, Arvind Kumar @ Nemichand and Surja Ram @ Surajmal, for offence under Section 302 IPC, and Ramnarayan, Birbal and Birju @ Brij Mohan, for offence under Section 302 read with 149 IPC, were sentenced to life imprisonment and pay a fine of Rs. 1000/-, in default whereof they were directed to further undergo six months of additional sentence. For offence under Section 148 IPC, all the five appellants were sentenced to six months imprisonment, and for offence under Section 448 IPC they were sentenced to three months of imprisonment. All the sentences were directed to run concurrently.

3. Moreover, by the impugned judgment, the learned Judge had acquitted Arvind Kumar, Surjaram, Ramnarayan, Birbal, Brij Mohan for offences under Sections 323/149, 148, and 448 IPC. The learned Judge had also acquitted Harlal and Harphool of offences under Sections 147, 323/149, 302/149, and 447 IPC. Hence, the State of Rajasthan has filed the criminal appeal against the accused respondents.

4. Briefly, the facts of the case are that on 19.7.1989, Harlal Singh (P.W.5) lodged a written report (Ex.P.12) with the S.H.O., Police Station, Laxmangarh, Distt. Sikar. When translated into English, the said written report (Ex.P.12) reads as under:

To,

The SHO,

Police Station Laxmangarh,

Distt. Sikar

Sir,

It is humbly submitted that yesterday, on 18.7.1989, around midnight my brother Laduram s/o Baksaram, and his two sons, Surendra and Prakash were sleeping in the courtyard. My brother Ladurams brother-in-law, Chandraram, and Ramlal s/o Juwara, by caste Jat, resident of Madhopura were also sleeping with us. Ladurams elder son, Brijendra, and his younger son, Mohan, were sleeping at a separate house constructed by Brijendra on the western side of the well. Suddenly, about 20-25 persons came, cursed and dragged out Brijendra and Mohan from the homes. They started assaulting them with barchhi (small axe), bhala (spear), lathies (wooden sticks), and swords. Brijendras wife raised an alarm. Then, I, my brother Laduram, my nephews Surendra, Prakash and Chandraram, and Ramlal rushed to their rescue. We carried lathis with us. The moment we reached there, Surjaram s/o Hukumaram, by caste Jat, resident of Rehnawa, and his son, Arvind @ Nemichand said now the true enemy, Laduram has come. Saying this, both of them attacked him with farsies which they were carrying. With this, Birju s/o Khumaram, by caste Jat, resident of Khevasar, Ramnarayan s/o Rambux started attacking him. Laduram was killed at the spot; Mohan, Brijendra, Prakash, Surendra sons of Laduram, and Chandraram were badly injured. Thinking that they had expired, the accused ran away. Brijendra and Surendra in order to protect themselves, inflicted lathi blows on Arvind and Ramnarayan. Arvind and Ramnarayans companions also said, while leaving, that they had killed Tara Singh Jat of Roru, so then who are we? Those whom I have named, I know them. Others I dont know them, but I can recognise them if they were brought
























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top