SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Raj) 1319

NISHA GUPTA
Chothmal – Appellant
Versus
Banshidhar Purohit – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:Prashant Sanghi, Advocate.
For the Respondent:B.B. Ojha, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - This second appeal under Section 100 CPC has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 16.12.93 passed by Additional Civil Judge No.1, Jaipur City, Jaipur in Civil Appeal No. 11/85 (5/85) (16/91) confirming the judgment and decree dated 18.3.85 passed by Munsiff and Judicial Magistrate, Chomu in Civil Suit No. 46/81.

2. The short facts of the case are that the appellant filed a suit for permanent injunction with the contention that the appellant is the owner of property shown green colour in the map annexed with the plaint and the respondent is the owner of the property shown in orange colour. In between the house of the appellant and respondent, there is a lane of 3 ft. The defendant respondent has made encroachment in the lane and has reduced it to 2.5 ft. and the disputed land has been marked 'XY' in the plan. The lane is existing from a long time and is being used by the appellant. The plaintiff's kitchen window has opening on the disputed land. The defendant wanted to close the window of the kitchen of the plaintiff by putting a chappar in front of them on which the plaintiff moved before the Gram Panchayat and defendant was restrained vide order dated 28.6












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top