SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Raj) 1980

SUNIL AMBWANI, PRAKASH GUPTA
Guotam Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants:Parvej Moyal, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. We have learned counsel for appellants. This Special Appeal has been filed against the judgment dated 12.9.2014 by which the writ petition filed by the appellants to allow to continue them on the post of Computer Operator with Machine, was dismissed on the ground that all the appellants were appointed as Computer Operator with Machine under the National Rural Health Mission on contract. The term of their contract has expired and in the meantime, the State Government has appointed the Computer Operators with designation as `Information Assistant' through regular selection process in the year 2013 for the work performed by the petitioners.

2. Learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition following the judgment in the case of Ashok Godara v. State of Rajasthan (SBCWP No.3503/2014 decided on 22.5.2014) in which following observations were made in para 14 and 15 of the judgment:

"14. As far as the Computer Operators are concerned, there is no dispute that with a different name and designation known as "Information Assistants" the regular selection process has already been held by the State Government in the year 2013 and since the regularly selected persons or Information













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top