SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Raj) 2063

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Sandeep Mehta, J.
Mohd. Irfan - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan & Anr. - Respondent
S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 1833 of 2015.
Decided On : 9-12-2015

Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Vandana Bhansali, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Rajesh Bhati, P.P.
For the Respondent No. 2:S.K. Verma, Advocate.

Consensual sexual relations between two adults without any assurance or force cannot substantiate the offence under Section 376 IPC.

Headnote:

QUASHING OF FIR - SECTION 376 IPC - CONSENSUAL SEXUAL RELATIONS - NO FORCE OR COERCION - FIR QUASHED: In a case involving allegations of rape, the court held that consensual sexual relations between two adults without any assurance or force could not substantiate the offence under Section 376 IPC. The court quashed the FIR and further investigation/proceedings against the accused.

Fact of the Case:

The complainant, a 30-year-old woman, filed an FIR against the accused, a polio-stricken man, alleging that he had raped her under the false promise of marriage. The accused denied the allegations and claimed that the sexual relations were consensual.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the complainant was a mature woman who was fully aware of the nature and consequences of the relationship with the accused. The court also noted that the accused was physically challenged and it was unlikely that he could have forced the complainant to have sex against her will.

Issues: Whether the sexual relations between the complainant and the accused were consensual or not.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the Supreme Court decision in Prashant Bharti v. State of NCT of Delhi, which held that a consensual physical relationship between two adults without any assurance could not substantiate the offence under Section 376 IPC.

Final Decision: The court quashed the FIR and further investigation/proceedings against the accused.

JUDGMENT

1. - The petitioner Mohd. Irfan has approached this Court by way of the instant misc. petition seeking quashing of the FIR No.192/2015 registered at the Police Station Nayashahar, District Bikaner for the offences under Sections 420 and 376 IPC. He is a physically challenged man suffering from residual polio causing 60% permanent disability in his left lower limb.

2. The complainant Respondent No.2 Mst. M aged 30 years submitted a written report at the Police Station Nayashahar on 22.5.2015 with the following allegations:

"vkt fnukad 22-5-2015 ds oDr 11-30 ,0,e0 ij esg:u iq=h Jh vgen vyh tkfr eqlyeku egkor mez 30 lky fuoklh if.Mr /keZdkaVk ds ikl chdkusj us mifLFkr Fkkuk gksdj ,d fyf[kr fjiksVZ cnh etewu Jheku Fkkukf/kdkjh] iqfyl Fkkuk&uk'kgj] fo"k;& 'kknh dk >kalk nsdj nsg 'kks"k.k djus okys ds fo:) eqdnek ntZ djok;k tkdj fxjQ~rkj fd;s tkus ekU;oj fuosnu gS fd iwxy jksM ij vkoklh; IykV [kjhn djus ds fy, v[kckj esa i<+dj eSaus loksZn; cLrh fLFkr U;w bf.M;k izksiVhZ Mhyj nqdku ij fnukad 24-12-2014 dks eSa eksgEen bjQku izksiVhZ Mhyj ls feyh tgka eSaus ,d IykV [kjhnus ds fy;s lEidZ fd;k o fd'r tek djok;h bl chp eks0 bjQku us esjs Qksu uEcj ds fy;s o dkQh ckj Qksu ij lEidZ fd;k o eq>s dbZ ckj Qksu djds cqyk;k rFkk esjs lkeus 'kknh dk >wBk >kalk izse Hkjh ckrsa djds fn;k o eq>s ckrphr djus dbZ ckj cqyk;kA fQj tc tc tgka eSa tkrh rks viuh dkj uEcj 6153 ;k 1653 ysdj vk tkrk rFkk esjh LdwVh [kM+h djokdj dkj esa ys tkrk o izse Hkjh ckrsa djds 'kknh dk >wBk >kalk nsdj esjk nsg 'kks"k.k djrkA og eq>s dHkh ykyx<+ cl LVs.M rks dHkh rhFkZ LrEHk xSl ,tsUlh ds ikl cqykdj esjh xkM+h ogka [kM+h djokdj eq>s ml jksM+ ls dkQh nwj ys tkrk tgka dsoy lqulku dksyksuh gks dksbZ Hkh vkcknh o ?kj u gks ekpZ@vizSy ls ,slk pyuk 'kq: gks x;k FkkA o esjs lkFk lsDl djus ds fy;s etcwj djrk esjs fcu 'kknh ds ,slk u djus ij esjh ekax [kwu ls Hkjdj eq>s vHkh bl eghus esa ;k tc eSa dgwa dksVZ eSfjt ds fy, rS;kj jgus dks dgrk rc eSaus ml ij fo'okl djds mlds lkFk jgus ls Lusg izse gksus ds dkj.k blds lkFk lsDl djus ij etcwj gqbZA ekax Hkjdj eSaus rq>s viuh iRuh Lohdkj dj fy;k gSA mlus eq>s fdlh Hkh pht dk izwQ ugha fn;k vkSj u gh eSaus mlls izse o Lusg gks tkus ds dkj.k dsoy 'kknh djus ds mn~ns'; ls dksbZ izwQ j[kkA vfUre esjs lkFk lsDl 16-5-2015 fiNys 'kfuokj dks fd;k fnukad 18-5-2015 dks eSa mlls vfUre ckj feyh o 1&2 fnu esa dksVZ eSfjt djus dk oknk mlls djok;k bu ckrksa esa eSaus mlls ml fnu dksbZ nsg 'kks"k.k ugha djok;k 19-5-2015 eaxyokj dks esjh mlls ckr 10 cts ds djhc gqbZ 10-30 cts feyus o 'kknh dk Qkbuy r; djus ds fy;s ysfdu vkt rd 10-30 cts ij eSaus Qksu mldks djds cqykus ds fy, Qksu dh lkjh fle 4 izdkj dh cUn iM+h gSA mlds ckn vkt rd mlus eq>ls Qksu ij ckr ugha dhA blls igys gekjk 1 fnu Hkh ,slk ugha vk;k fd Qksu ij ckr ugha gqbZ gksA d'i;k eqdnek djokdj ltk fnyok;h tk,A izkFkhZ esg:u iq=h esg:u iq=h vgen vyh egkor if.Mr /keZdkUVk ds ikl chdkusj eksckby 9521853420 etewu fjiksVZ ls ekeyk vijk/k /kkjk 376] 420 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk dk ?kfVr gksuk ik;k tkus ij v0 la[;k 192@2015 ctqxZ mijksDr esa ntZ dj eq> iqfyl fujh{kd njtkjke Fkkukf/kdkjh }kjk izkjEHk fd;k x;kA izfr;ka ,Q0vkbZ0vkj0 fu;ekuqlkj tkjh dh xbZA ,l0vkj0 tkjh dh xbZA"

3. On the basis of the above report, an FIR No.192/2015 was registered against the petitioner at the Police Station Nayashahar for the above offences. The complainant during the course of investigation was examined under Section 161 Cr.P.C. as well as under Section 164 Cr.P.C. and more or less, she repeated the allegations set out in the FIR. It appears that arising from the dispute of purchase of a plot which the complainant herself has stated in her FIR, the petitioner's father Mohd. Sadiq had earlier filed an FIR No.191/2015 against the complainant at the Police Station Nayashahar for the offences under Sections 385 and 504 IPC.

4. During investigation of the FIR No.192/2015, the complainant executed an affidavit of compromise with the petitioner, wherein it was affirmed on oath that the petitioner never forced her into having






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top