2015 Supreme(Raj) 1459
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT AT JAIPUR BENCH
Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, Nisha Gupta, JJ.
Nagu @ Narendra - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan - Respondent
D.B. Criminal Appeal No. 295 of 2006. (Against the Judgment dated 8.3.2006 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge Malpura, District Tonk in Sessions Case No.9/2005).
Decided On : 23-03-2015
For the Appellant:Ashvin Garg, Advocate.
For the State: Aladeen Khan, Public Prosecutor.
In cases of sudden and unpremeditated killings without any motive or intention to cause fatal injury, the offense may be reduced from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
Headnote:
CRIMINAL APPEAL - SECTION 302 IPC - SECTION 304 PART I IPC - SECTION 304 PART II IPC - SECTION 323 IPC - CULPABLE HOMICIDE NOT AMOUNTING TO MURDER - SUDDEN AFFAIR - NO PREMEDITATION - NO INTENTION TO KILL - SENTENCE MODIFIED FROM LIFE IMPRISONMENT TO TEN YEARS RIGOROUS IMPRISONMENT.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for causing the death of Suresh by throttling him. The incident occurred during a quarrel over a ball game between the deceased and the appellant. The appellant appealed the conviction and sentence.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that there was no premeditation or intention to kill on the part of the appellant. The incident occurred suddenly and without any motive. The court also noted that there was no external injury on the deceased's body, which suggested that the appellant did not intend to cause fatal injury.
Issues: Whether the appellant's act of throttling the deceased constituted murder under Section 302 IPC or culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 IPC.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on several precedents to hold that the appellant's act fell under Section 304 Part I IPC, which deals with culpable homicide not amounting to murder. The court considered the following factors: (i) there was no previous enmity between the deceased and the appellant; (ii) the appellant had no motive to cause the death of the deceased; (iii) the incident occurred suddenly and without any premeditation; (iv) there was no external injury on the deceased's body, suggesting that the appellant did not intend to cause fatal injury.
Final Decision: The court modified the appellant's conviction from Section 302 IPC to Section 304 Part I IPC and reduced the sentence from life imprisonment to ten years rigorous imprisonment.
"To,
The SHO Sahib,
P.S. Pachewar.
Sub.: For taking legal action.
Sir,
In the above noted subject it is submitted that today on 8.5.2005 at about 4-5 PM my nephew Suresh was sitting outside the house on Chabutari and was playing cricket. At that time Nagu S/o. Jagdish Brahmin was also sitting outside Roop Ji's house in varandah. The ball went towards his house. On this, Nagu abused Suresh. In turn, Suresh also abused. Meanwhile, Nagu came running and caught hold of neck of my nephew Suresh. I, Chhitar Kakaji and mother of Suresh came running and made an attempt to save. But Nagu had not released his grip from the neck of Suresh and had turned the same with force. Suresh immediately fell on the spot. Nagu had pressed the throat of Suresh by force due to which he died. We made an attempt to apprehend Nagu. But he ran away. I am presenting this report. Legal action be taken. The body is lying in the varandah of the house.
Sd/-."