SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Raj) 1860

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Vineet Kothari, J.
Pradeep Kumar Bishnol and others - Appellant
Versus
Amandeep and others - Respondent
S.B. Civil Revision Petition No.160 and 161 of 2015.
Decided On : 8-10-2015

Advocates:
For the Defendants No.1 to 4-Petitioner:Mr. A.K. Rajvanshy, Advocate.

A suit for partition cannot be dismissed at the threshold on an application under Order 7, Rule 11 CPC if mixed questions of fact and law are involved.

Headnote:

ORDER 7 RULE 11 CPC - SUIT FOR PARTITION - CANCELLATION OF WILLS - MIXED QUESTION OF FACT AND LAW - APPLICATION FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT - DISMISSED - REVISION PETITION - DISMISSED.

Fact of the Case:

Plaintiff Amandeep filed a suit seeking cancellation of two Wills executed by his grandfather in favor of defendant Pradeep Kumar and, in the alternative, partition of the suit property as joint family property. The defendants filed an application under Order 7, Rule 11 CPC for rejection of the plaint, arguing that a suit for partition cannot be maintained by a son during the lifetime of his father. The trial court rejected the application, and the defendants filed revision petitions.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the suit could not be thrown out at the threshold on an application under Order 7, Rule 11 CPC because mixed questions of fact and law were involved that required evidence to be led by the parties. The court also held that the transposition of defendants No. 7 & 8, who had accepted the plaint averments in their written statement, did not cause any prejudice to the contesting defendants.

Issues: 1. Whether a suit for partition can be maintained by a son during the lifetime of his father? 2. Whether the suit should be dismissed at the threshold on an application under Order 7, Rule 11 CPC?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that the maintainability of a suit for partition by a son during the lifetime of his father is a mixed question of fact and law that requires evidence to be led by the parties. 2. The court held that the suit could not be dismissed at the threshold on an application under Order 7, Rule 11 CPC because mixed questions of fact and law were involved.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the revision petitions filed by the defendants.

JUDGMENT

1. - The present revision petitions have been filed by Pradeep Kumar, Prithvi Raj and Dharampal all the three sons of Shri Banwari Lal Bishnoi and Banwari Lal Bishnoi himself, who were defendants in the suit filed by Amandeep s/o Shri Raja Ram, who is brother of plaintiff, Bhanwarlal Bishnoi, against the rejection of their application under Order 7, Rule 11 CPC by the learned trial court of the Senior Civil Judge, Raisinghnagar, District Sriganganagar in Civil Suit No.11/2013 (558/2014) - Amandeep & Ors. v. Pradeep Kumar & Ors. by the impugned order dated 11.05.2015 , with the following observations:-

"cgl izkFkZuk&i= vUrxZr vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh0ih0lh0 ds nkSjku vf/koDrk izfroknh }kjk vius izkFkZuk&i= ds dFkuksa dh iqujko'fRr djrs gq;s dFku fd;k x;k fd oknh }kjk gLrxr okn LoxhZ; irjke dh olh;r dks voS/k] 'kwU; ,oa izHkkoghu ?kksf"kr djokdj mDr lEifRr dk caVokjk ds vuqrks"k gsrq is'k fd;k x;k gSA bl laca/k esa oknh ds firk jktkjke ds thfor jgrs gq;s oknh dks dkuwuu nkok izLrqr djus dk dksbZ yksdlLVs.MkbZ gkfly ugha gS o uk gh mls dksbZ okn dkj.k mRiUu gksrk gSA vr% okn dkj.k izkIr ugha gksus ds dkj.k oknh dk okn [kkfjt djus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA

[k.Mu esa vf/koDrk oknh dk dFku gS fd izfroknh }kjk ftu vk/kkjksa dks vius izkFkZuk&i= esa mBk;k x;k gS] mDr rF; lk{; ij vk/kkfjr gSa] ftu ij dksbZ Hkh fu"d"kZ okn lk{; gh fn;k tk ldrk gSA izfroknh }kjk egt izdj.k esa nsjh ,oa my>u iSnk djus ds vk'k; ls izkFkZuk&i= is'k fd;k x;k gS tks fd dkfcys [kkfjt gSA

mHk; i{kksa ds rdksZa ij euu fd;k x;k ,oa i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA lacaf/kr fof/k dk v/;;u fd;k x;kA fof/k ds lqLFkkfir fl)kUr ds vuqlkj vkns'k VII fu;e 11 lh0ih0lh0 ds izkFkZuk&i= ds vfHkopuksa dks ns[kuk vko';d gS rFkk bl laca/k esa izfroknh i{k }kjk ;g mtz fy;k x;k gS fd oknh ds firk ds thfor gksrs gq;s oknh dks okn ykus dk vf/kdkj ugha gksus ds dkj.k oknh dks okn dkj.k mRiUu ugha gksrk gSA

vkns'k VII fu;e 11 lh0ih0lh0 ds vuqlkj tgka okn&i= okn gsrq izdV ugha djrk gS] ogka okn&i= ukeatwj dj fn;k tk;sxkA Lohd'r :i ls oknh }kjk ;g okn vius nknk Lo0 irjke dh olh;r fnukad 25-2-2002 ,oa fnukad 25-3-2004 dks vius fgrksa ds foijhr voS/k] vekU;] 'kwU; ,oa izHkkoghu ?kksf"kr dj mDr lEifRr ds fojklru caVokjk djrs gq;s oknh dks mldk fgLlk fu;ekuqlkj ?kksf"kr djkus dk vuqrks"k pkgk x;k gS rFkk okn&i= esa ;g vafdr fd;k x;k gS fd mDr olh;r QthZ] irjke dh bPNk ds foijhr ,oa mudh vufHkKrk ls rS;kj dh xbZ gSA vr% okn&i= ds voyksdu ls ;g Li"V gS fd oknh }kjk ;g okn bl vk/kkj ij is'k ugha fd;k x;k gS fd Lo0 irjke dks mDr olh;r djus dk dksbZ vf/kdkj ugha Fkk] cfYd mDr olh;r dks QthZ o Lo0 irjke dh vufHkKrk esa rS;kj djus ds vk/kkj ij mDr olh;r dks 'kwU; ,oa izHkkoghu ?kksf"kr djkus dk vuqrks"k pkgk x;k gSA vr% bl LVst ij ;g ekuus dk dksbZ vk/kkj ugha gS fd oknh dks gLrxr okn ykus dk dksbZ yksdlLVs.MkbZ ;k okn dkj.k ugha gS rFkk ;g rF; fof/k ,oa rF; dk fefJr iz'u (Mixed question of fact and law) ftl ij dksbZ fu"d"kZ fook|d dk;e dj i{kdkjksa dh lk{; ds mijkUr gh fn;k tk ldrk gSA QyLo:i izkFkZuk&i= oknh Lohdkj djus ;ksX; u ik;s tkus ds dkj.k [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA

mHk;i{kdkjuksa esa fo}ku vfHkHkk"kdx.k dks izkFkZuk&i= rkjh[k 8-4-2011 ij lquk x;kA vf/koDrk izkFkhZx.k@izfroknhx.k la[;k 7 o 8 }kjk vius izkFkZuk&i= ds dFkuksa dh iqujko'fRr djrs gq;s dFku fd;k x;k fd oknh ,oa izfroknh ds fgr leku gS] blfy;s izfroknhx.k dks izfroknh dh Js.kh ls oknh dh Js.kh esa izfrLFkkfir fd;k tk;sA

[k.Mu esa vf/koDrk izfroknh la[;k 1 yxk;r 4 }kjk dFku fd;k x;k fd izfroknhx.k@izkFkhZx.k }kjk ;g Li"V ugha fd;k x;k fd gLrxr izkFkZuk&i= fdl izko/kku ds rgr is'k fd;k x;k gS rFkk oknh dk okn dkj.k dk vk/kkj vyx gS rFkk izfroknh }kjk izkFkZuk&i= esa vyx vk/kkj fy;k x;k gS] vr% mUgsa oknh dh Js.kh esa Mkyus ls okn dh iwjh izd'fRr cny tk;sxh] vr% izkFkZuk&i= izkFkhZx.k [kkfjt fd;k tk;sA

mHk; i{kksa ds rdksZa ij euu fd;k x;k ,oa i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA fof/kd :i ls izfroknh dks oknh ds :i esa i{kkarj.k djus dh vuqKk rHkh nh tk ldrh gS] tc vkosnd dk dksbZ ,slk lkjoku iz'u gS tks vU; izfrokfn;ksa esa ls fdlh ds fo:) f













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top