SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Raj) 1924

GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS
Preeti Sharda – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Vivek Shah, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Vishal Raj Mehta, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. The instant writ petition has been filed by the married daughter of the deceased employee late Sh. Girdhar Das Dhoot for providing appointment on compassionate ground.

3. The petitioner's father late Sh. Girdhar Das Dhoot was working as LDC in the Government Press, Jodhpur. He died while in service on 6.1.2013. Thereafter, an application was filed by the mother of the petitioner for providing appointment to the petitioner, who is married daughter of the deceased employee Sh. Girdhar Das Dhoot. The application filed for appointment of the petitioner on compassionate ground was rejected on the ground that in the Rules of 1996, there is definition of dependent under Rule 2(g) (c) in which there is no provision to provide appointment to the married daughter.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the petitioner is married daughter of deceased employee and as per definition enumerated in the rules of 1996, there is no provision to provide appointment to the married daughter, but in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Shreejith L. v. Dy. Director (Education) Kerala & Ors reporte









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top