2015 Supreme(Raj) 1803
KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA
Pani – Appellant
Versus
Mangi Lal – Respondent
Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. J.P. Goyal Senior Counsel with Mr. Aditya Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Sanjaya Mehrishi, Advocate.
JUDGMENT
1. - The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that the order dated 12.5.2014 (Annexure-4) passed by Sub Divisional Officer, Ajmer, along with order dated 8.10.2014 (Annexure-5) passed by Revenue Appellate Authority and the order dated 13.6.2015 (Annexure-6) passed by Revenue Board, be set aside as they are contrary to the well settled legal position, and are perverse.
2. It is contended that the Sub Divisional Officer, Ajmer, Revenue Appellate Authority and the Board of Revenue have committed a grave illegality by dismissing the suit filed by the petitioners for declaration and injunction.
3. Mr. J.P. Goyal, the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners has submitted that Rama father-in-law of petitioner No. 1 and grandfather of the petitioners No. 2 to 7 was inducted sub-tenant before 15.10.1955 when Rajasthan Tenancy Act came into operation. It is stated that by virtue of enactment of Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955, Rama ancestor of the petitioners became khatedar of the land. The learned Senior Counsel submitted that on 14.6.2007, the petitioners had filed a suit before Sub Divisional Of
Click Here to Read the rest of this document