RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT AT JAIPUR BENCH
Mehesh Chandra Sharma, J.
Lakhan Singh - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan - Respondent
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 852 of 2008.
Decided On : 14-09-2015
CRIMINAL LAW - ROAD ACCIDENT - NEGLIGENCE - DRIVER - DEATH OF 35 PERSONS - INJURY TO 19 PERSONS - CONVICTION AND SENTENCE - CONFIRMATION - REVISION PETITION - DISMISSED.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a driver, was convicted and sentenced by the trial court for causing the death of 35 persons and injuries to 19 persons in a road accident due to his negligence. The appellate court confirmed the conviction and sentence. The petitioner filed a revision petition challenging the conviction and sentence.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the trial court and the appellate court had rightly assessed the evidence submitted by the prosecution. The court also found that the petitioner was negligent in driving the vehicle, which resulted in the accident and the death and injuries of the victims.
Issues: 1. Whether the trial court and the appellate court erred in convicting and sentencing the petitioner for causing the death of 35 persons and injuries to 19 persons in a road accident due to his negligence. 2. Whether the petitioner was negligent in driving the vehicle, which resulted in the accident and the death and injuries of the victims.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the trial court and the appellate court had rightly assessed the evidence submitted by the prosecution. The court also held that the petitioner was negligent in driving the vehicle, which resulted in the accident and the death and injuries of the victims. The court relied on the evidence of the prosecution witnesses, which established that the petitioner was driving the vehicle rashly and negligently, and that there were more than 60 passengers in the vehicle at the time of the accident, which was in violation of the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the revision petition and confirmed the conviction and sentence imposed by the trial court and the appellate court.
"Complainant PW-2 Abdul Hakeem lodged a written report Ex.-P/1 at Police Station, Nainwa, District Bundi regarding an incident alleged to have taken place on 13.11.1996. On the basis of the said report, the police registered FIR No. 404/1996 for the offence under Sections 304A, 279 and 337 IPC end investigation was commenced. After completion of investigation, the police filed the charge sheet against the accused petitioner for the offence under Sections 279, 337, 304A Indian Penal Code in the Court of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nainwa, District Bundi, who took cognisance of the offences. Thereafter the charges were read over to the accused petitioner for the offences under Sections 279, 337, 304A Indian Penal Code and Sections 66/192, 123/192 and 184 of MV Act. The accused petitioner denied for the same and claimed for trial. The prosecution produced its witnesses and got recorded their statements. Thereafter the statement of the accused person was recorded. After hearing the arguments of both the sides, the learned trial court, vide judgement/order dated 25.10.2007 convicted and sentenced the accused petitioner, as indicated above.
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.