SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Raj) 915

VIJAY BISHNOI
Mukesh Raghav – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Vineet Jain, Advocate.
For the Respondent: M.A. Bhurat, Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT

1. - The petitioner has filed this criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. against the order dated 18.6.2008 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge No. 2, Bikaner (hereinafter referred to as 'the revisional court') in Criminal Revision Petition No. 69/2007, whereby the revisional court dismissed the revision petition preferred by the petitioner against the order dated 13.7.2007 passed by the ACJM No. 2, Bikaner. The petitioner has also challenged the order dated 13.7.2007 passed by the ACJM No. 2, Bikaner (hereinafter referred to as 'the trial court') whereby the application filed by the petitioner under Section 197 Cr.P.C. was rejected. The petitioner has also prayed that the proceedings qua the petitioner pending in the trial court may be quashed and set aside.

2. Brief facts of the case are that one Smt. Rekha Jain lodged an FIR No. 9/2002 dated 6.1.2002 at Police Station Sadar, Bikaner while alleging that she was pregnant and was consulting with senior Doctor of PBM Hospital, Bikaner since last six months and as advised, she was admitted in the said hospital on 24.11.2001 and remained in hospital upto 2.12.2001. However, on 2.12.2001, she was transferred to t



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top