SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Raj) 401

DWARKA PRASAD GUPTA, KANTA BHATNAGAR
Raj Construction Co. – Appellant
Versus
Additional Commissioner of Income Tax – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. - The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur Bench, at the instance of the assessee, M/s. Raj Construction Co., Mount Abu, has made this reference to this court under section 256(1) of the Income-tax tax Act, 1961, for the opinion of this court on the following question of law:

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and on a proper construction of the partnership deed dated January 27, 1966, and application in Form No. 11, the Tribunal was correct in law in refusing grant of registration under section 185 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, to the assessee-firm ?"

2. The assessee is a firm styled as "M/s. Raj Construction Co.", Mount Abu. The assessment year in question is 1967-68. The assessee-firm was constituted of three partners, viz., Munshilal, Laxmi Chand and Babu Bhai, under a partnership deed to this effect executed on January 27, 1966. The firm filed an application in Form No. 11 for the aforesaid assessment year for registration under section 184 of the Income-tax Act (hereinafter to be referred as "the Act"). The Income-tax Officer (for short "the ITO") was of the view that the shares of the losses of the partners were not specified in the deed an


















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top