SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Raj) 1919

VIJAY BISHNOI
Nikhat Baano – Appellant
Versus
Narendra Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Applicant-Appellant:Vipul Dharania, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - This restoration application has been filed on behalf of the applicant-appellant seeking restoration of the appeal bearing S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.2295/2011, which was dismissed on account of non compliance of the order dated 26.07.2012 passed by this Court.

2. The present restoration application is time barred by 457 days. An application (IA No.361/2014) under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condoning the delay in filing the present restoration application has been filed by the applicant-appellant.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant-appellant has submitted that the appeal bearing S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.2295/2011 filed by the applicant-appellant was listed before the Court on 26.07.2012 under the defects category, in which the Registry has pointed out the defect that the certified copy of the impugned award has not been filed. It is submitted that this Court vide order dated 26.07.2012 has ordered to remove the defect within a period of two weeks, failing which the appeal shall stand dismissed automatically. It is also submitted by learned counsel for the applicant-appellant that an application for dispensing with the condition of submitting certified copy






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top