2007 Supreme(Raj) 67
2007 (1) W.L.N. 359 (Raj.)
Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench)
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P. S. ASOPA
Karnail Singh & Ors.
Versus
The Board of Revenue & Anr.
S.B. Civil Writ Petition Nos. 3343 to 3345/1995—Decided on 12.01.2007.
APPEARANCES :
Mr. R.K. Goyal, Advocate, for the Petitioners.
Mr. B.L. Awasthi, AGA for the State.
Headnote:(A) Rajasthan Imposition of Ceiling on Agricultural Holding Act, 1973—Sec. 15(2)—Ceiling proceeding—Power of re-opening cases—When not exercised—State Government cannot stay/review/withdraw/amend or rescind an order passed by it under Sec. 15(2), after the same has been complied with by the Additional Collector. [Paras 11, 12, 21 to 24]
Held: In the instant case, the Government was having, limited power of review to reopen the ceiling case, in case, the same is prejudicial to the interest of the State Government or contrary to the concerned provisions of law by issuing a notice and authorising an officer subordinate to it to decide it afresh, according to law, therefore, rights of the parties have beer determined only to extent of reopening by the Government on the aforesaid ground and full opportunity on merit will be available to the party before the Authorised Officer and then in appeal before the Board of Revenue. In case, such a power is conceded to the Government then it will be open to the government to cancel or supersede the reopening order and terminate the quasi-judicial proceeding pending before the Authorised Officer/Board of Revenue. Therefore, withdrawal of the notice/order by the State Government that too after final decision by the Authorised Officer is, wholly without jurisdiction.
[Para 22]
In view of above, Larger Bench of. Board of Revenue has rightly decided the reference in the following terms:-
"That the State Government can not stay/review/withdraw/amend or rescind an order passed by it under Sec. 15(2) of the Rajasthan Imposition of Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings Act of 1973, after the same has been complied with by the Additional Collector."
[Para 23]
Accordingly, common judgment of the Larger Bench of the Board of Revenue dt. 19.06.1995 is upheld.[Para 24]
(B) Rajasthan General Clauses Act, 1955—Sec. 23—General Clauses Act, 1897—Sec. 21—Sec. 23 is pari materia with Sec. 21. [Para 11]
2. By the aforesaid writ petitions, the petitioners have mainly challenged the judgment of Larger Bench of Board of Revenue dt. 19.06.1995 whereby it has been held that the State Government cannot stay/review/withdraw or rescind an order passed by it under Sec. 15(2) of the Act of 1973, after the same has been complied with by the Additional Collector. The other ancillary/consequential prayers have also been made.
3. Briefly stated the relevant facts of the case are that the present petitioners are ultimate transferee of the land initially held by Narendra Singh, against whom the ceiling proceedings were initiated and the same were dropped on 19.04.1971. No appeal was filed by the State Government against the order dt. 19.04.1971, but a notice/order under Sec. 15(2) of the Act of 1973 was issued to Narendra Singh on 29.01.1980 for re-opening of the proceedings. The Additional Collector, Sriganganagar in pursuance of the order of the State Government dt. 29.01.1980 passed an order on 25.01.1982 for declaring 623 Bigha 8 Biswa land surplus with a further direction to take the possession of the same. Against the said order dt. 25.01.1982, the petitioners filed appeals under Sec. 23(2A) of the Act of 1973 before the Board of Revenue. In few cases, during the pendency of the proceedings before the Board of Revenue, the State Government by a detailed order of the Revenue Minister dt. 29.06.1988 withdrew the notice/order dt. 29.01.1980 on the ground that the same was issued without service of notice on the assessee Narendra Singh and the Hon’ble Minister vide its order dt. 05.05.1991 held that Shri Narendra Singh did not hold any land in excess of the limit and the notice was dropped. In pursuance of the order of the Minister dt. 05.05.1991, the State Government issued an order on 18.05.1991 that re-opening orders dt. 29.01.1980 and 14.04.1980 are set-aside. This order was addressed to the Registrar, Board of Revenue where appeals/review petitions were pending. Learned Single Member, who was seized with the appeal/review referred the matter to the larger Bench of the Board of Revenue on the following point:-
“Whether the State Government can stay/review/withdraw or rescind an order passed by it under Sec. 15(2) of the Rajasthan Imposition of Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings Act, 1973 after the same has been complied with by the Additional Collector?”
4. Before the larger Bench of the Board of Revenue, the Government Advocate took the preliminary objection that the larger Bench has no jurisdiction to hear this case and the Single Member has no jurisdiction to refer the matter to the larger Bench. The larger Bench of the Board of Revenue over-ruled the said objection of the State Government and decided the case and vide its order dt. 19.06.1995 held that the State Government has no power to withdraw its reopening order under the Act of 1973. Against the said order, the present writ petitions have been filed.
5. The State Government has filed reply to the writ petition and admitted therein to the extent that cases of the petitioner were re-opened according to the order of the State Government under Sec. 15(2) of the Act of 1973 and the same were sent to the Additional Collector, Sriganganagar for re-deciding. The State Government has not filed any writ petition against the judgment of the Board of Revenue dt. 19.06.1995, which shows that the State has accepted the answer of the reference made by the Board of Revenue.
6. The counsel for the petitioners raised an objection that Government is estopped from challenging the order