Prakash Tatia, J.—Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner/defendant is aggrieved against the order dt. 09.05.2006 by which the trial Court decided issue No.5A about limitation against the petitioner and held that the respondent/plaintiff’s suit is within the period of limitation.

3. Brief facts of the case are that the plaintiff/respondent filed a suit claiming compensation of Rs.10 lakhs against the defendant/petitioner after paying Court fees of Rs.50,065/- which is provided for ordinary civil suit for compensation. The plaintiff/non-petitioner in the suit alleged that on 24.02.2000 at about 8:30 PM, the defendant/petitioner with an intention to kill the plaintiff fired 3 shots upon the plaintiff causing injury to the plaintiff for which FIR was lodged on 24.02.2000 under Sec. 307 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. After investigation, challan was filed against the petitioner. The petitioner was convicted by Additional Sessions Court (Fast Track), Hanumangarh vide judgment dt. 26.11.2002 and held him guilty under Section 307 IPC and sentenced him for 10 years imprisonment and imposed a fine of Rs.6,000/- and also awarded sentence of 3 years under Sec. 27 of the A

Click Here to Read the rest of this document