SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Raj) 51

DWARKA PRASAD
Shiv Narain – Appellant
Versus
Raji – Respondent


Advocates:
L.R. Mehta, for Appellants; H.M. Parekh, for Respondents.

Judgement

JUDGEMENT :- This second appeal has been filed against the judgement and decree passed by the learned District Judge, Jodhpur on Mar. 30, 1968 and arises in the following circumstances.

2. One Chaturbhuj had four sons, Sitaram, Ramlal, Kriparam and Dayaram. Sitaram had a son Chhotu, while Dayaram had a son Salehraj and Ramlal died issueless. Kriparam had two sons Nenji and Bastiram. Shivnarain, and Laxminarayan plaintiffs are the sons of NenJi, while their third brother Ganestual is said to have gone in adoption to Ramlal. Bastiram left his widow. Smt. Gauri, a son Arjunsingh and five daughters including Omkumari and Smt. Raji defendants. Arjunsingh who was, unmarried, died on July 17, 1952, leaving two houses situated to Mohalla Khanda Falsa at Jodhpur. After the death of Arjunsingh, the plaintiffs Shivnarain and Laxminarain asserted their claim in respect of the estate of Arjansingh Deceased on the ground of being his nearest heir, as they were Arjunsingh’s uncle’s sons. In one of the houses the upper storey was in possession of the plaintiffs, while the lower portion of the said house was in the possession of the defendants Smt. Omkumari and Smt. Raji, sisters of Arjuns



































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top