SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(Raj) 32

V.P.TYAGI
Mangilal – Appellant
Versus
District Excise Officer, Ajmer – Respondent


Advocates:
Guman Mal Lodha and B.R. Mehta, for Petitioner; A.K. Mathur, Dy. Govt. Advocate, for Respondents.

Judgement

ORDER :- This writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution has been filed by petitioner Mangilal to challenge the order of the District Excise Officer, Ajmer dated 19th December, 1969, suspending the petitioner's license granted to him under the Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950.

2. The case of the petitioner is as follows :

3. The petitioner was given a license under the Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950 (hereinafter called the Act) for carrying on the business of selling country liquor in the town of Beawar. This license was granted for a period commencing from 1-4-1969 to 31-3-1970. It is alleged that the petitioner by filing a separate writ application before this Court had challenged the guarantee system on which the licenses were granted in the State by the Excise authorities for the sale of country liquor and that writ petition was admitted by this Court. This action of the petitioner resulted in the straining of the relations between the petitioner and the Excise Officers and it is said that it is out of a revengeful spirit that the respondents were out to find faults with the petitioner and to punish him. On 17-12-1969 the Inspector of the Excise Department came for the





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top