SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(Raj) 227

P.N.SHINGHAL
Faujmal – Appellant
Versus
Nathulal – Respondent


Advocates:
K. S. Lodha, for Appellant; S. K. Mal Lodha, for Respondents.

Judgement

JUDGMENT :- This is an appeal by defendant Faujmal from the appellate Judgment and decree of the learned Civil Judge of Udaipur dated April 6, 1959, confirming the judgment and decree of the learned Munsif of Rajasthan dated April 28, 1958, in a suit for specific performance of a contract for sale of immoveable property.

2. Nathulal (defendant No. 1) mortgaged his two shops situated in village Jilola to the plaintiff and one other person on Baisakh bad 7, Sin. 2001 for Rs. 1100/- and this fact is not disputed. The plaintiff claimed that Nathulal entered into a contract to sell one of the shops to him for Rs. 300 and executed agreement Ex. 1 to that effect on February 6, 1955. It was also the plaintiff's CUSF that he was all along prepared to pay Rs. 300/- and have the sale deed executed in his favour but Nathulal avoided doing so and ultimately executed a sale deed of the suit shop in favour of Ranglal (defendant No. 2) on July 11, 1957. This is way the plaintiff instituted his suit on July 25, 1957, soon after the disputed sale, for specific performance of the contract in his favour.

3. Defendant Nathulal denied that he entered into a contract for the sale of the shop to th






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top