MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA
Deepak Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
Hon'ble SHARMA, J.—Since both the bail applications moved by the accused petitioners arise out of common FIR, hence same are being decided by this common order.
2. Heard learned counsel for the accused-petitioners, learned P.P. appearing for the State assisted by learned counsel for the complainant on the second bail application moved under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
3. In brief facts of the case are that the petitioners were working as Sales Executive in a partnership firm M/s. D.B. Distributors having its office at B-525-B, Road No.7, VKI Area, Jaipur. At the relevant time some alleged irregularities took place in the computer software and it was alleged to be committed by he Sales Executives / Sales Team Leaders and also by the accused-petitioners. The said partnership firm is the authorized distributor for the State of Rajasthan M/s. Proctor and Gamble Home Products India Limited, Mumbai for the last 12 years and so far as the accused petitioners are concerned, they were appointed sales executive of M/s. D.B. Distributors. However, the accused-petitioners were assigned to work of sales and order and since then the accused petitioners worked as sales executes in the said firm.
4.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.