SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Raj) 196

VINEET KOTHARI
Roop Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Swaroop Singh Sisodia, for Petitioner;
Anil Upadhayay, P.P., for State

JUDGMENT

Hon'ble Dr. Kothari, J.—Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor for the Sate and perused the impugned orders passed by the learned Courts below.

2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submitted that said accused is in custody in pursuance of judgment order dated 11.4.2008 passed by learned trial Court convicting and sentencing the accused-petitioner for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 419, 406 and 120-B of IPC. The accused petitioner has been sentenced as under :-

1. Under Section 420 IPC : 2 years' rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 200/- in default of payment of fine undergo two months' simple imprisonment.

2. Under Section 419 IPC : 1 year's rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 100/- in default of payment of fine undergo one month's simple imprisonment.

3. Under Section 406 IPC : 1 year's rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 100/- in default of payment of fine undergo one month's simple imprisonment.

4. Under Section 120-B IPC : 1 year's rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 100/- in default of payment of fine undergo one month's simple imprisonment.

3. Against the judgment order of the learned trial Court dated 11.4.2008 con




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top