VINEET KOTHARI
Khushi Mohd. – Appellant
Versus
Aneesha – Respondent
Hon'ble Dr. KOTHARI, J.—Heard learned counsel for Mr. Khushi Mohd. and Ors. and Mr. Usman Gani, father of Aneesha.
2. These two cross petitions, one S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 882/2009 - Khushi Mohd. and Ors. vs. Aneesha and S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 1698/2007 - Annesha vs. Khushi Mohd. and Ors. are directed against the order dated 4.8.2007 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sujangarh disposing of the criminal appeal No. 33/2007 - Aneesha vs. Khushi Mohd. and Ors. and Criminal Appeal No. 32/2007 - Khushi Mohd. and Ors. vs. Aneesha. By the said order, the learned Additional Sessions Judge dismissed he appeal by the wife Aneesha and partly allowed the appeal of the husband Khushi Mohd.
3. Both these criminal appeals wee filed by them against the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Sujangarh on 22.3.2007 in Criminal Case No. 47/2007 - Annesha vs. Khushi Mohd. and Ors. under the provisions of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.
4. The learned trial Court while allowing the application under Section 12 of the Domestic Violence Act, 2005 directed that the respondents No.1 to 6 (husband Khushi Mohd. and his family memb
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.