SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Raj) 974

ARUN MISHRA, AJAY RASTOGI
Ajay Malik – Appellant
Versus
Shashi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Vipul Jaiman, for Appellant;
P.C. Sharma for Ashwani Chobisa, for Respondent

JUDGMENT

Hon'ble RASTOGI, J.—Instant Misc. appeal U/s 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 (“Act, 1984”) is directed against interim order dt.04/07/2009 passed by learned Family Court, Kota in Civil Misc. Case No.189/2008 whereby application filed U/s 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (“HM Act”) was partly allowed granting maintenance @ Rs.1,000/- per month to each of two minor children and Rs.3100/- towards litigation expenses.

2. The parties were married on 28/01/1992 as alleged, according to Hindu rites and customs and out of their wedlock, two children were born. But due to some marital feud & dispute, appellant (husband) filed application U/s 13 of HM Act seeking divorce and pendente divorce petition before Family Court, an application was filed by respondent (wife) U/s 24 of HM Act seeking interim maintenance for herself and two minor children dependent upon her. Taking note of material on record and also the fact that the wife has also certain income source at her own, the learned Family Court considered it appropriate to grant in all Rs.2,000/- per month for two minor children towards interim maintenance pendente divorce petition and Rs.3100/- towards legal expenses in favour of th











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top