SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Raj) 102

RAGHUVENDRA S.RATHORE
Rajendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
M.K. Kaushik, for Petitioner;
M.F. Beig, Dy. Govt. Counsel, for Respondents

Hon'ble RATHORE, J.—This writ petition of the year 1997 has come up today for final hearing. The learned counsel for the petitioner had informed that during the pendency of the writ petition in due course, the petitioner has taken away the brief from him. However, no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner even in the second round. Therefore, this Court had directed Mr. M.K. Kaushik, Advocate to assist the Court in the case which had been initially filed by him and got admitted on 26.5.2005.

2. The writ petition had come to be filed before this Court as the petitioner was aggrieved of the orders passed by the respondents on 28.1.91 (Annex. 7) and 28.10.91 (Annex. 8). Therefore, it has been prayed by the petitioner that the impugned orders be quashed and set aside and the respondents be directed to award all consequential benefits.

3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the petitioner was appointed on the post of Constable and subsequently he was confirmed on the said post after his services having been found satisfactory. In the year 1988, the petitioner was posted as a Constable in District Dholpur. It was on 2.4.1988 that a Parchabayan of Smt. Sumita Chakrawati came



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top