SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Raj) 537

R.S.CHAUHAN
Om Prakash Veshnav – Appellant
Versus
Vidhya Veshnav – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
B.M. Kalla, for Petitioner;
R.S. Mankad, for Respondent

Hon'ble CHAUHAN, J.—Aggrieved by the order dated 03.05.2008, passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Udaipur, whereby the learned Judge has directed the petitioner-husband to pay a maintenance of Rs.800/- per month to the respondent-wife, Smt. Vidhya Veshnav, the petitioner-husband has approached this Court.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner-husband and the respondent-wife were married on 20.9.1999 according to the Hindu customs and rites. According to the respondent-wife, for the first three years, the petitioner-husband and his family members kept her well. However, subsequently they started demanding that she should bring Rs.5,000/- from her parents. Moreover, they started subjecting her to physical and mental cruelty. Eventually, she was thrown out of the house. Because of their cruelty, she had filed a criminal case for offences under Sections 498A, 323, 406 and 120B IPC, which is pending before the courts of Kanod. The respondent-wife also claims that the petitioner-husband has married the daughter of one Kalu Das through the Nata ceremony and the said lady is living with him. Unable to maintain herself, the respondent-wife had filed an application unde







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top