SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Raj) 521

R.S.CHAUHAN
Dilip Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
N.R. Goswami, for Petitioners;
Mahipal Bishnoi, Public Prosecutor

Hon'ble CHAUHAN, J.—The petitioner-husband is aggrieved by the order dated 26.10.2010, passed by the Family Court, Udaipur, whereby the learned Court has directed the petitioner to pay a maintenance of Rs.2,100/- per month to the respondent-wife, Smt. Anita, from 26.10.2010 onwards.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner-husband, Dilip Kumar, and respondent-wife, Anita, were married on 27.04.1999 according to the Hindu customs and rites. According to Anita, Dilip Kumar and his family members kept her well for the first six months. However, afterwards they started demanding dowry. They also subjected her to mental and physical cruelty. Subsequently, they abandoned her leaving her at her parental place. Unable to maintain herself, Anita filed an application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. for seeking maintenance from Dilip. Vide order dated 5.6.2008, the Family Court directed Dilip to pay a maintenance of Rs.800/- per month. Aggrieved by the said order, Dilip filed a revision petition before this Court. Vide order dated 13.1.2010, this Court accepted the revision petition and set aside the order dated 5.6.2008 and remanded the case back to the learned Family Court. After the












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top