SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Raj) 385

S.S.KOTHARI
Mohsin Khan – Appellant
Versus
J. M. Gandhi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
S.S. Hora, for Appellant;
Parag Rastogi, for Respondent

Hon'ble KOTHARI, J.—The appellant (the plaintiff) filed suit for declaration and injunction alleging that he took Shop No.426, Indira Bazar, Jaipur on rent 16 years ago from the respondent (the defendant) on a monthly rent of Rs.250/- which was increased from time to time and the current rent is Rs.500/- per month. The defendant wants to increase the rent to Rs. 1000/- per month. On 13.5.2001 he threatened the appellant that he should vacate the shop peacefully or else his articles will be thrown out of the shop. No rent deed was executed and the defendant did not give any receipt of rent. The plaintiff is an illiterate person and has a tailoring business in the shop. The defendant has also obtained his signatures on some blank papers and he is afraid that he may prepare some forged documents. The plaintiff prayed for a decree of declaration that he is the tenant of the defendant in Shop No. 46 and the defendant may be restrained by permanent injunction from getting him to vacate the shop without following due process of law.

2. The defendant denied the tenancy in his written statement and submitted that he gave the aforesaid shop for use to his daughter, Anjula Gandhi, in 1987 who





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top