R.S.CHAUHAN
BASF India Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
2. In brief the facts of the case are that on 22nd July, 2005, the Insecticide Inspector – cum – Assistant Director of Agriculture (Plant Protection) went to the premises of M/s Gautam Krishi Sewa Kendra, at Taleda, in District Bundi, the petitioner No.3, and took samples of a herbicide called IMAZETHAPYR 10% SL. The said herbicide was manufactured on 15.06.2005 and was due to expire on 14.06.2007. On 01.08.2005, a sample of the said herbicide was sent to the Regional Pesticides Testing Laboratory, Chandigarh. Vide report dated 03.04.2006, the Laboratory informed the Assistant Director of Agriculture that the active ingredient was only 8.3% instead of 10% as claimed in the herbicide. Thus, the said herbicide was misbranded. On 05.06.2006, a show cause notice was issued to the petitioner No.3. Vide reply dated 19.06.2006, the petitioner No.3 informed the Assistant Director of Agriculture that, in fact, th
Municipal Corporation of Delhi vs. Ram Kishan (AIR 1983 SC 67) 4
M/s Bharat Insecticides Ltd. vs. State (1997(1) WLC 657) 4
Northern Mineral Ltd. vs. Union of India & Anr. ((2010) 7 SCC 726) 6
State of Punjab vs. National Organic Chemical Industries Ltd. ((1996) 11 SCC 613) 23
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.