2011 Supreme(Raj) 300
ARUN MISHRA, PRAKASH TATIA
Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
Advocates Appeared
Vinit Mathur, for Appellant;
Anand Purohit, Addl. Advocate General;
Yashpal Khileri, for Respondent No.1;
M.C. Bhoot & M.R. Singhvi, for Applicants
Hon'ble TATIA, J.—This intra-court appeal has been preferred by the Rajasthan High Court being aggrieved against certain directions issued by the Single Bench of this Court in order dated 29.9.2009 in S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.1265/2009 -State of Raj. vs. Smt. Rekha Mahawar whereby the Single Bench of this court directed the Registrar of the High Court to scrutinize all the cases filed at Principal Seat of High Court at Jodhpur as well as the cases filed at the Bench of High Court at Jaipur and that too of past 5 years and find out the cause of action as explained in para no.24 of the impugned judgment and then put a note about the territorial jurisdiction and put those cases in defect side with registration number of the cases, obviously as defect case and then such cases shall be transferred to the appropriate seat or bench. The directions as given in para no.26 are as follows: -
“26. Since as aforesaid, this question keeps on cropping up at both the places oft and on and more often than not at Jaipur Bench causing undesirable imbalance, it is directed that the Registry shall scrutinize all the cases filed at both the places in past 5 years and if the cause of action as explained
Click Here to Read the rest of this document