GOVIND MATHUR
Pinki – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
2. The petitioner, considering herself a dependent of late Shri Mohanlal, who was working as Veterinary Assistant at the time of his death with the respondents, applied through her mother-in-law for appointment on compassionate grounds, as per the Rajasthan Compassionate Appointment of Dependents of Deceased Government Service Rules, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as “the Rules of 1996”). The claim of the petitioner has been rejected being not “Dependent” of the deceased government servant as defined under Rule 2(c) of the Rules of 1996. As per Rule 2(c) the term “Dependent” means, a spouse, son, un
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.