SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Raj) 1230

MOHAMMAD RAFIQ
Jhuta Ram – Appellant
Versus
Mukesh Kumar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Ram Singh Rathore, for Claimants;
R.P. Vijay, for Insurance Company;
Service of Respondents No.1 and 2 is dispensed with

Hon'ble RAFIQ, J.—These two appeals are directed against common award dated 14.09.2009 of learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Kishangarh (Ajmer) in MAC Case No.276/2007, by which learned Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs.3,90,000/- as compensation to claimants in a death claim case.

2. A claim petition was filed by five claimants for accidental death of one Gulab Bai involving motorcycle No.RJ-01-14M-2680, which was insured with National Insurance Company Limited. While the claimants have approached this court for enhancement of the compensation, the insurance company has filed the appeal assailing the quantum of compensation.

3. Learned counsel for insurance company has argued that deceased Gulab Bai was mother of claimants and claimants cannot be said to be wholly dependent on her income. According to judgment of the Supreme Court in Smt. Manjuri Bera vs. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. and another 2007 (10) S.C.C. 643 = RLW 2007(2) SC 1384, a person, who is not dependent, cannot maintain a claim petition for payment of compensation. It was argued that age of the deceased was wrongly taken as 45 years. In the postmortem report, her age was mentioned as 48 years, as against which the





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top