MATHUR, M.—This revision petition has been filed under Section 230 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 (in short to be referred as `the Act') against the order passed by the Settlement Officer-cum-Revenue Appellate Authority, Sikar on 5.4.2010 in civil suit No. 163/2008.

2. Brief facts of the case are that in the appeal filed by the present non-petitioner No. 1 against petitioner and rest of the non-petitioners before Settlement Officer-cum-Revenue Appellate Authority, Sikar, petitioner Nathu Ram filed an application for site inspection of the disputed land on 14.10.2009 and that application was rejected by the S.O. - cum- RAA, Sikar on 5.4.2010 saying that at the stage of final argument, site inspection is not necessary. Hence aggrieved by that order dated 5.4.2010, the petitioner has filed this revision petition.

3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for the proper appreciation of the evidence and rightful adjudication of the matter, it is necessary that site should be inspected and actual position with respect to possession of the disputed land may be obtained by appointing Commission. But ign

Click Here to Read the rest of this document