Dr. TIWARI, M.—This is a revision petition under Section 230 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 (in short `the Act') against the impugned order dated 28.3.07 of Revenue Appellate Authority Jaipur by which he allowed the application filed under Order 13 Rule 10 read with Order 41 Rule 27 of the Civil Procedure Code (C.P.C.).

2. The facts, in brief, leading to the revision are that Revenue Appellate Authority Jaipur during pendency of an appeal, filed before him under Section 223 of the Act against the judgment and decree dated 21.9.06 of Sub-Divisional Officer Shahpura allowed in application submitted before him under Order 13 Rule 10 read with Order 41 Rule 27 of the C.P.C. by the impugned order dated 28.3.07, aggrieved against which the present revision petition is filed in this court.

3. I have heard the learned counsel of both the parties.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the non-petitioner could have obtained a certified copy himself and presented the same in the court instead of calling paper or copy from the record of other case in the court. The record of one court file cannot be read into the another case file. The court was free to consolidate two diff

Click Here to Read the rest of this document