Dr. TIWARI, M.—This revision petition under Section 230 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 (in short 'the Act') is directed against the impugned order dated 1.5.2006 of Sub-Divisional Officer, Jaipur (Second) by which he consolidated two revenue suits for joint trial.

2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that there are two revenue suits pending in the Court of Sub-Divisional Officer, Jaipur with regard to the same suit lands. Suit No. 292/1996 is filed by Ramswaroop adopted son of Prahalad against Ghisi Lal and others under Section 88 and 188 of the Act with regard to the suit lands described in para 1 of the plaint. Another suit No. 77/1999 is filed by Ghisi Lal and Mool Chand against Ramswaroop and others with regard to the same suit lands under Section 88 and 53 of the Act. In suit No. 292/1996 'Ramswaroop vs. Ghisi Lal and Others', the non-petitioner No.2 Moolchand filed an application before Sub-Divisional Officer Jaipur for consolidation of the two suits for joint trial, mainly on the grounds that the subject matter of dispute is the same and the parties to the two suits are almost the same. This application for consolidation of two suits was allowed by the Sub-Divisio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document