Dr. TIWARI, M.—All the three above cited revision petitions filed under Section 84 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 (in short `the Act') are taken together for common judgment, as they involve common law point and have almost the same parties.

2. Briefly stated, the facts of these cases are that on death of a khatedar tenant namely Ghisa Ram son of Uda Ram, a mutation No. 483 was opened and attested in favour of Nathmal son of Balu Ram on the basis of sale deed dated 20.5.2003 by Gram Panchayat Malsisar (District Churu). Similarly another mutation No. 484 was attested by Gram Panchayat Malsisar by its order dated 20.5.2003. Likewise two more mutations No. 81 and 485 were attested in favour of Bhagirath Prasad son of Ghisa Ram on the basis of adoption deed, by Gram Panchayat Malsisar vide its order dated 20.8.2003 and 20.5.2003. Mutations, No. 483 and 484 dated 20.5.2003 were challenged in appeal by Jassu Ram under Section 75 of the Act before Sub-Divisional Officer, Sujangarh. Similarly mutation No. 81 dated 20.8.2003 and mutation No. 485 dated 20.5.2003 were challenged together by Jassu Ram before Sub-Divisional Officer, Sujangarh. Sub-Divisional Officer in all the three app

Click Here to Read the rest of this document