[Citation : 2012(2) RLW 1711 (Raj.)]
(Rajasthan High Court)
Geeta Devi Vs. State of Rajasthan (Mathur, J.)
HON'BLE GOVIND MATHUR, J.
HON'BLE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN-II, J.
Geeta Devi
Versus
State of Rajasthan
D.B. Cr. (Parole) Writ Petition No. 8587 of 2011, decided on 20.10.2011
Writ petition allowed. (Paras 9, 13 to 17)
jktLFkku cUnh [kqyh gok f'kfoj fu;e] 1972] fu;e 3¼m½] 9 11] 12( Hkkjr dk lafo/kku] vuqPNsn 14 & fdlh dSnh dh oSokfgd fLFkfr ds vk/kkj ij mls [kqyh gok f'kfoj esa izos'k nsus ls badkj djuk & izkfFkZ;k ,d o`) :X.k efgyk gS & mlds rhu iq= o ifr Hkk-na-la- dh /kkjk 302 ds rgr nks"kfl) gksus ds dkj.k fiNys ukS o"kksZ ls tsy esa can gS rFkk og vdsyh gh gS & ekuoh; vk/kkj ij vius ,d iq= dk [kqyh gok f'kfoj esa izos'k pkgk & bl vk/kkj ij badkj fd;k fd og vfookfgr gS & vfHkfu/kkZfjr & ,d vfookfgr canh Hkh ifjokj dk ,d vax gksrk gS vkSj ifjokj dk eqf[k;k Hkh gks ldrk gS & vr% og Hkh lekt esa iqu% izfr"Bkiu ds ;ksX; gS Hkys gh mldk Lo;a dk ifjokj u gks] og fu;e 9 ds izko/kkuksa ds vuqlkj [kqyh gok f'kfoj es j[ksa tkus dk gdnkj gksrk gS & oSokfgd fLFkfr ds vk/kkj ij fd;k x;k oxhZdj.k Li"V :i ls HksnHkko dkjh gS rFkk foosdh ugha D;ksafd ;g fu;eksa ds mn~ns'; ds lkFk bldk fcuk fdlh lEcU/k ds ,d oxZ ds Hkhrj oxZ mRiUu djrk gS & vuqPNsn 14 dk mYya?kudkjh gS] nks"kiw.kZ ?kksf"kr dj vikLr fd;k & mldh oSokfgd fLFkfr dks vuns[kh djrs gq, mlds ekeys ij fopkj djus ds funsZ'k fn;sA ¼in la[;k 9] 13 ls 17½
;kfpdk Lohdkj dhA
^^mijksDr fo"k;kUrxZr lknj fuosnu gS fd eq> izkfFkZ;k ds canh iq= izgykn jke B/o d`".k xksiky iq= x.ks'kjke tkfr lksuh fuoklh xqM+k Hkxoku nkl] iqfyl Fkkuk ikapkSM+h] ftyk ukxkSj ds jgus okys gksdj orZeku esa Hkk-na-la- dh /kkjk 302 ds rgr vkthou dkjkokl dh ltk fiNys 9 o"kksZ ls l[r ltk l}kpj.k ds lkFk dsUnzh; dkjkx`g tks/kiqj esa Hkqxr jgs gSA
¼d½ ;g gS fd esjk ifjokj esa N% lnL;ksa dk ifjokj gS ftuesa ls 3 iq= o o ifr tsy esa can gS o iq=h llqjky vkrh tkrh gSA ?kj ij eSa vdsyh jgrh gwa rFkk o`)koLFkk ds dkj.k vf/kdrj fcekj jgrh gwa o`)koLFkk esa esjh lsok o ns[kHkky djus okyk Hkh dksbZ ugha gSA ifjokj esa dksbZ l{ke lnL; ugha gksus ds dkj.k esjk thou ujd cu dj jg x;k gSA
¼[k½ ;g gS fd dsUnzh; dkjkx`g-tks/kiqj esa Hkk-na-la- dh /kkjk 302 dh vkthou dkjkokl dh ltk Hkqxr jgs vU; cfUn;ksa dks ekrk-firk dh lsok o ns[kHkky ds fy, canh [kqyk f'kfojksa ij fHktok;s gS ftuesa cafn;ksa ds uke fuEu izdkj ls gS fd 01 uohu lksuh o 2 t;fd'ku iq= dUgS;kyky o vU; dks canh [kqyk f'kfojksa ij fHktok dj ykHkkfUor fd;k gSA mDr nksuksa canh dsUnzh; tsy tks/kiqj esass gh ltk Hkqxr jgs FksA
vr% ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; ds pj.k deyksa esa n.Mor vtZ gS fd ifjokj dh n;uh; n'kk o iwjs ifjokj ds tsy esa can rFkk esjh o`)koLFkk vkSj canh iq=ksa }kjk Hkqxrh yEch ltk vof/k vkfn 2 dkj.kksa dks ekuoh; n`f"Vdks.k ij j[krs gq, dsUnzh; dkjkx`g tks/kiqj ls canh [kqyk f'kfoj ukxkSj ¼Open air camp Nagaur½ ij LFkkukUrfjr djkus dk vkns'k nsdj ykHkkfUor djkosaA**
2. In view of the provisions of Rule 3(m) of the Rajasthan Prisoners Open Air Camp Rules, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as "the Rules of 1972") the respondents are not considering claim of convict Prahlad Ram for admission to open air camp. Rule 3(m) aforesaid provides that a prisoner who is unmarried shall ordinarily be not eligible for being sent to open camp.
3. The issue requires adjudication is that whether the material status of a prisoner can be a reason sufficient for denying admission to open air camp or the classification of prisoners on basis of their marital status is having any rational for admission to open air camp?
4. The intent of the Rules of 1972 is to encourage good conduct, satisfactory performance of work, life of self-discipline among the convicts, pre-release to the convicts, opportunity to learn social adjustment and economic self-dependence of the prisoners. Under the Rules of 1972 the work at open air camp, internal management of the camp, lodging and boarding at the camp are also designed in a fashion to avail the intent aforesaid.
5. As per Rule 7 of the Rules of 1972, work in open camp shall be as under:-
"(a) The prisoner will get one or more of the following work in the Open Camp-
(i) Agriculture.
(ii) Manufacturing or industrial work.
(iii) Work in any form.
(iv) Any work of public utility.
(v) Construction work, digging of canals or dams.
(b) Any prisoner desires of perusing a hobby as a side work apart from the vocation that he adopts, will be allowed to do so wit the permission of the works and discipline committee.
(c) Every prisoner shall devote at least two hours a day twice a work for work of common utility which will be decided by the works and discipline committee."
6. The internal management of the camp as per Rule 11 of the Rules of 1972 is through the Prisoners Panchayat, Works and Discipline Committee and Prisoners, Cooperative Society established in the Open Camps. Sub-rule (2) of Rule 11 provides that the prisoners panchayat shall consist of not less than five and not more than seven members as may be decided by the Inspector General of Prisons, keeping in view the number of prisoners in a camp. The Panch shall be elected by the prisoners, but a casual vacancy shall be filled by nomination by the Inspector General of Prisons from amongst the prisoners. The term of each panchayat will be for a year. Th
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.