SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Raj) 1088

[Citation : 2012(2) RLW 1711 (Raj.)]
(Rajasthan High Court)
Geeta Devi Vs. State of Rajasthan (Mathur, J.)
HON'BLE GOVIND MATHUR, J.
HON'BLE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN-II, J.
Geeta Devi
Versus
State of Rajasthan
D.B. Cr. (Parole) Writ Petition No. 8587 of 2011, decided on 20.10.2011

Advocates Appeared
K.R.Bhati, for Sukesh Bhati, Assisted by Sunny Changara, for Petitioner;
K.R. Bishnoi, Public Prosecutor

Headnote:Rajasthan Prisoners Open Air Camp Rules, 1972, Rule 3(M), 9, 11, 12; Constitution of India, Art. 14 — Denying admission to open air camp to prisoner on the basis of his marital status — Petitioner is an old aged ill lady — Her three sons and husband being convict u/S. 302 IPC are in jail for nine years and is all alone — Sought one of her sons admission to open air camp on humanity grounds — Denied on the ground that he is unmarried — Held — An unmarried prisoner too is part of family and may be head of family also deserves rehabilitation in society, even if he is not having his own family, he is also entitled to be lodged in an open air camp as provisions of Rule 9 — Classification made on the basis of marital status is apparently discriminatory and have no rational as it creates a class within a class without having any nexus with the object of the Rules — Violative of Art. 14, declared bad and set aside — Directed to consider his case ignoring his marital status.

       Writ petition allowed. (Paras 9, 13 to 17)

       jktLFkku cUnh [kqyh gok f'kfoj fu;e] 1972] fu;e 3¼m½] 9 11] 12( Hkkjr dk lafo/kku] vuqPNsn 14 & fdlh dSnh dh oSokfgd fLFkfr ds vk/kkj ij mls [kqyh gok f'kfoj esa izos'k nsus ls badkj djuk & izkfFkZ;k ,d o`) :X.k efgyk gS & mlds rhu iq= o ifr Hkk-na-la- dh /kkjk 302 ds rgr nks"kfl) gksus ds dkj.k fiNys ukS o"kksZ ls tsy esa can gS rFkk og vdsyh gh gS & ekuoh; vk/kkj ij vius ,d iq= dk [kqyh gok f'kfoj esa izos'k pkgk & bl vk/kkj ij badkj fd;k fd og vfookfgr gS & vfHkfu/kkZfjr & ,d vfookfgr canh Hkh ifjokj dk ,d vax gksrk gS vkSj ifjokj dk eqf[k;k Hkh gks ldrk gS & vr% og Hkh lekt esa iqu% izfr"Bkiu ds ;ksX; gS Hkys gh mldk Lo;a dk ifjokj u gks] og fu;e 9 ds izko/kkuksa ds vuqlkj [kqyh gok f'kfoj es j[ksa tkus dk gdnkj gksrk gS & oSokfgd fLFkfr ds vk/kkj ij fd;k x;k oxhZdj.k Li"V :i ls HksnHkko dkjh gS rFkk foosdh ugha D;ksafd ;g fu;eksa ds mn~ns'; ds lkFk bldk fcuk fdlh lEcU/k ds ,d oxZ ds Hkhrj oxZ mRiUu djrk gS & vuqPNsn 14 dk mYya?kudkjh gS] nks"kiw.kZ ?kksf"kr dj vikLr fd;k & mldh oSokfgd fLFkfr dks vuns[kh djrs gq, mlds ekeys ij fopkj djus ds funsZ'k fn;sA ¼in la[;k 9] 13 ls 17½

       ;kfpdk Lohdkj dhA

       

Hon'ble MATHUR, J.—An application submitted by Smt. Geeta Devi, mother of convict Shri Prahlad Ram, has been treated as petition for writ and the contents of that are as under:-

^^mijksDr fo"k;kUrxZr lknj fuosnu gS fd eq> izkfFkZ;k ds canh iq= izgykn jke B/o d`".k xksiky iq= x.ks'kjke tkfr lksuh fuoklh xqM+k Hkxoku nkl] iqfyl Fkkuk ikapkSM+h] ftyk ukxkSj ds jgus okys gksdj orZeku esa Hkk-na-la- dh /kkjk 302 ds rgr vkthou dkjkokl dh ltk fiNys 9 o"kksZ ls l[r ltk l}kpj.k ds lkFk dsUnzh; dkjkx`g tks/kiqj esa Hkqxr jgs gSA

¼d½ ;g gS fd esjk ifjokj esa N% lnL;ksa dk ifjokj gS ftuesa ls 3 iq= o o ifr tsy esa can gS o iq=h llqjky vkrh tkrh gSA ?kj ij eSa vdsyh jgrh gwa rFkk o`)koLFkk ds dkj.k vf/kdrj fcekj jgrh gwa o`)koLFkk esa esjh lsok o ns[kHkky djus okyk Hkh dksbZ ugha gSA ifjokj esa dksbZ l{ke lnL; ugha gksus ds dkj.k esjk thou ujd cu dj jg x;k gSA

¼[k½ ;g gS fd dsUnzh; dkjkx`g-tks/kiqj esa Hkk-na-la- dh /kkjk 302 dh vkthou dkjkokl dh ltk Hkqxr jgs vU; cfUn;ksa dks ekrk-firk dh lsok o ns[kHkky ds fy, canh [kqyk f'kfojksa ij fHktok;s gS ftuesa cafn;ksa ds uke fuEu izdkj ls gS fd 01 uohu lksuh o 2 t;fd'ku iq= dUgS;kyky o vU; dks canh [kqyk f'kfojksa ij fHktok dj ykHkkfUor fd;k gSA mDr nksuksa canh dsUnzh; tsy tks/kiqj esass gh ltk Hkqxr jgs FksA

vr% ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; ds pj.k deyksa esa n.Mor vtZ gS fd ifjokj dh n;uh; n'kk o iwjs ifjokj ds tsy esa can rFkk esjh o`)koLFkk vkSj canh iq=ksa }kjk Hkqxrh yEch ltk vof/k vkfn 2 dkj.kksa dks ekuoh; n`f"Vdks.k ij j[krs gq, dsUnzh; dkjkx`g tks/kiqj ls canh [kqyk f'kfoj ukxkSj ¼Open air camp Nagaur½ ij LFkkukUrfjr djkus dk vkns'k nsdj ykHkkfUor djkosaA**






2. In view of the provisions of Rule 3(m) of the Rajasthan Prisoners Open Air Camp Rules, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as "the Rules of 1972") the respondents are not considering claim of convict Prahlad Ram for admission to open air camp. Rule 3(m) aforesaid provides that a prisoner who is unmarried shall ordinarily be not eligible for being sent to open camp.

3. The issue requires adjudication is that whether the material status of a prisoner can be a reason sufficient for denying admission to open air camp or the classification of prisoners on basis of their marital status is having any rational for admission to open air camp?

4. The intent of the Rules of 1972 is to encourage good conduct, satisfactory performance of work, life of self-discipline among the convicts, pre-release to the convicts, opportunity to learn social adjustment and economic self-dependence of the prisoners. Under the Rules of 1972 the work at open air camp, internal management of the camp, lodging and boarding at the camp are also designed in a fashion to avail the intent aforesaid.

5. As per Rule 7 of the Rules of 1972, work in open camp shall be as under:-

"(a) The prisoner will get one or more of the following work in the Open Camp-

(i) Agriculture.

(ii) Manufacturing or industrial work.

(iii) Work in any form.

(iv) Any work of public utility.

(v) Construction work, digging of canals or dams.

(b) Any prisoner desires of perusing a hobby as a side work apart from the vocation that he adopts, will be allowed to do so wit the permission of the works and discipline committee.

(c) Every prisoner shall devote at least two hours a day twice a work for work of common utility which will be decided by the works and discipline committee."

6. The internal management of the camp as per Rule 11 of the Rules of 1972 is through the Prisoners Panchayat, Works and Discipline Committee and Prisoners, Cooperative Society established in the Open Camps. Sub-rule (2) of Rule 11 provides that the prisoners panchayat shall consist of not less than five and not more than seven members as may be decided by the Inspector General of Prisons, keeping in view the number of prisoners in a camp. The Panch shall be elected by the prisoners, but a casual vacancy shall be filled by nomination by the Inspector General of Prisons from amongst the prisoners. The term of each panchayat will be for a year. Th



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top