MAHESH BHAGWATI
Virendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ramdhan – Respondent
2. Having heard the learned counsel for the appellant and carefully perused the impugned judgment, it is noticed that on 18th January, 2004, at about 3.00 PM the appellant-claimant-Virendra Singh was coming and when he reached near Kheda Choudhary Hotel, one Jeep bearing registration No.RJ-06-C-7899 suddenly came and wrongly hit the claimant as a result of which he sustained grievous injuries on his person.
3. Learned counsel for the appellant canvassed that the appellant was a cleaner and his monthly income was Rs.3,000/- per month on the date of occurrence but the learned Tribunal is found to have considered the minimum wages i.e. Rs.73/- per day, permissible on that day.
4. Learned counsel further canvassed that the appellant not only sustained simple injuries but sustained fracture on his leg also as a result of which he was not able to perform his routine functions as usual. The learned Tribunal did not consider all these
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.