SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Raj) 1417

2012(1) CCR 310 (Raj.)
(Rajasthan High Court)
Jaipur Bench
R.S.R.T.C. Vs. Jamna Bai & Ors. (Rafiq, J.)
HON'BLE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ, J.
Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation
Versus
Jamna Bai & Ors.
S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.681 of 1998, decided on 12.12.2011

Advocates Appeared
M.K. Verma, for Appellant-RSRTC

Headnote:Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Sec. 166 — Liability of RSRTC — Passengers forced the driver of the bus of appellant RSRTC to start the bus and cross the flowing nala, which was full of water — Accident took place due to own negligence of the passengers — Held — Appellant could not satisfy as to who forced and how the force was applied on him — It cannot be believed that he did so as he was beaten by the passengers — Evidence of the driver and conductor could alone be nai and assertion cannot be accepted — Tribunal rightly awarded Rs. 1,88,000/- in a death claim for the accident that took place on 15.7.1995. (Paras 1, 2)

       eksVj ;ku vf/kfu;e] 1988] /kkjk 166 & fuxe dk nkf;Ro & vihykFkhZ fuxe ds cl pkyd dks ;kf=;ksa us cl LVkVZ djds ikuh ls Hkjs gq, cgrs ukys esa ls mls ikj djus gsrq etcwj fd;k & Lo;a ;kf=;ksa dh ykijokgh ds dkj.k nq?kZVuk ?kVh & vfHkfu/kkZfjr & vihykFkhZ bl ckr dk lek/kku ugha dj ldk fd fdlus mls etcwj fd;k rFkk ml ij cy dk iz;ksx dSls fd;k x;k & bl ckr ij fo'okl ugha fd;k tk ldrk fd mlus ,slk blfy, fd;k D;ksafd ;kf=;ksa }kjk mldh fiVkbZ dh xbZ & pkyd ,oa ifjpkyd dk lk{; gh ugha ekuk tk ldrk rFkk izk[;ku dks Lohdkj ugha fd;k tk ldrk & 15-7-1995 dks gqbZ nq?kZVuk gsrq e`R;q nkos ds ekeys esa vf/kdj.k }kjk iznku fd;k x;k 1]88]000@- dk izfrdj mfpr gSA ¼in la[;k 1] 2½

       vihy [kkfjt dhA

       

Hon'ble RAFIQ, J.—Ground of appeal that has been urged in assailing the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Baran dated 15.5.1997 by the learned counsel for the appellant-RSRTC is that the passengers forced the driver of the bus of appellant-RSRTC to start the bus and cross the flowing nala, which was full of water. Accident took place due to own negligence of the passengers and therefore the appellant cannot be held liable to make payment of compensation to the claimants. Tribunal has analysed this argument in the light of the evidence of various witnesses and the other evidence available on record. Tribunal has found that the appellant could not satisfy as to who forced and how the force was applied on the driver and when the driver sat on the staring, he started the engine of the vehicle and then drove the same into the nala. It cannot be believed that he was doing so as he was beaten by the passengers. Evidence of the driver and conductor could alone be nai and assertion cannot be accepted. Tribunal awarded Rs.1,88,000/- in a death claim. The accident took place on 15/7/1995.

2. I therefore do not find any infirmity in the award and reason to interfere therewith. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. The appellant shall comply with the award within thirty days. A copy of this order be forwarded to claimant-respondent No.1.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top