MOHAMMAD RAFIQ
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Harmit Singh – Respondent
2. Learned counsel for appellant has argued that the vehicle that was insured was a jeep, a private vehicle. The claimant was travelling in a jeep and that he sustained injuries because of his own negligence. The evidence shows that the driver of the jeep was driving the same at a very high speed. Besides, the learned counsel for the appellant argued that income of the claimant cannot be accepted at Rs.5500/- per month at the time the accident took place. The claimant contended that he was serving as Area Manager with a private concern, namely, M/s Bani Mutual Benefit Limited Company. Apart from that he was working as insurance agent and running an electric shop. But none of these facts are proved. The claimant has neither produced permanent account nu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.