MOHAMMAD RAFIQ
Laxmi Chhabra – Appellant
Versus
Vikash Chhabra – Respondent
2. Contention of the learned counsel for the appellants is that the award passed by the learned Tribunal suffers from contradictions while not deciding the issues in correct perspective. While Tribunal in Issue No.2 has held that deceased was driving the Motorcycle bearing No.RJ-29M-8662 during currency of the insurance policy but in Issue No.1, it has erroneously held that the claimants failed to prove that deceased died due to accident. Learned counsel referred to the findings of the Tribunal in paras 2 and 11 where, the learned Tribunal noted that in response to the notice issued under Section 133 of the Act, owner of the vehicle in his reply has stated that his father was driving the vehicle when the accident took place. In this connection, learned counsel for the appellants referred to the post-mortem report (Ex.8) of the deceased, where it has been clearly mentioned that deceased died
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.