SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Raj) 370

BAJRANG LAL SHARMA
Teejni Devi – Appellant
Versus
Mansukh Ram – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Bhinya Ram Choudhary, for Petitioner

'kekZ] lnL;-&izkFkhZk }kjk ;g fuxjkuh jktLFkku dk'rdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ¼la{ksi esa ^vf/kfu;e*½ dh /kkjk 230 ds vUrxZr mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] esM+rk flVh ftyk ukxkSj ds vkns'k 19-1-2011 ¼izdj.k la[;k 32@2008½ ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr dh x;h gSA

2- izkFkhZ;k }kjk izLrqr fuxjkuh ds la{ksi esa rF; bl izdkj gS fd vizkFkhZx.k Jh eulq[kjke ,oa Jh jkefd'ku dh vksj ls ijh{k.k U;k;ky; esa izkFkhZ;k ,oa vizkFkhZx.k la[;k 3 ls 7 ds fo:) [kkrsnkjh vf/kdkjksa dh ?kks"k.kk ,oa caVokjs dk ,d fu;fer okn vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 88] 53 ds vUrxZr mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] esM+rk flVh ds U;k;ky; esa izLrqr fd;k x;kA ijh{k.k U;k;ky; }kjk bl okn esa tokc nkok izLrqr gksus ds ckn 7 rudh;kr dk;e dh x;hA ijh{k.k U;k;ky; ds le{k izfroknhx.k dh vksj ls ,d vkosnu i= vUrxZr vkns'k 14 fu;e 2 nhokuh izfØ;k lafgrk dk izLrqr dj ;g fuosnu fd;k x;k fd fook|d la[;k 4 o 5 dkuwuh vkifRr ij vk/kkfjr gSa vr% budk fu.kZ; igys fd;k tkosA ijh{k.k U;k;ky; us vius vkns'k fnukad 19-1-2011 ls izfroknh Jh [khaojkt vkfn dh vksj ls izLrqr vkosnu i= dk [kkfjt dj fn;kA ftlls O;fFkr gksdj ;g fuxjkuh bl U;k;ky; esa izLrqr dh x;h gSA

3- izkFkhZ;k }kjk izLrqr fuxjkuh dks fopkjkFkZxzg.k djus ds fcUnw ij fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd izkFkhZ;k dh cgl lquh x;hA

4- fo}ku vfHkHkk"


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top