SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Raj) 1077

DINESH MAHESHWARI
Reda Ram through LRs. – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
N.L. Joshi, for Petitioners;
Trilok Joshi, for Respondents No.5/1 to 5/4 (Caveator)

Hon'ble MAHESHWARI, J.—Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and having examined the material placed on record, this Court is not persuaded to consider interference in the writ jurisdiction in the orders as passed by the revenue authorities remanding the matter to the allotting authority for the purpose of reconsideration of the question of allotment of 3 bighas and 18 biswas of land as a small patch.

2. It appears that the land in question, comprised in kila Nos. 22 to 25 of Murabba No. 42 at Chak 78 RB, was sought to be taken in allotment as a small patch and for that matter, late Shri Reda Ram, the predecessor of the present petitioners, who was holding the land in adjoining Murabba No. 55 made an application but another application seeking allotment of the same land as small patch was also made by late Shri Bhoma Ram, the predecessor of the respondents No. 5/1 to 5/4, who was holding the other parcels of land in the said Murabba No. 42.

3. The allotting authority, by its order dated 12.11.1990, proceeded to make the allotment of the land in question in favour of Reda Ram while observing that Bhoma Ram did not appear after making the application.

4. It is borne out f












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top