SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Raj) 34

MAHESH BHAGWATI
Kishan Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Gram Panchayat, Niwaru – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Sudesh Bansal, for Petitioners;
Rizwan Ahmed, for Respondent No.1;
Mahendra Joshi, for Respondents

Hon'ble BHAGWATI, J.—By way of the instant writ petition, the petitioners have beseeched to quash and set aside the order dated 18th July, 2009 whereby the learned Civil Judge (Jr.Div.) Jaipur District, Jaipur allowed the application of the respondent Nos. 2 & 3 filed under Order 1 Rule 10 of CPC impleading them to be party defendants in the suit.

2. The petitioners are found to have filed the suit against the Gram Panchayat, Niwaru on 22nd December, 2008 for mandatory injunction. During the pendency of the suit, the respondents-applicant Nos.2 & 3 filed the afore-stated application under Order 1 Rule 10 of CPC for impleading them to be party defendants in the suit. The application was allowed by the learned trial Court, hence, the petitioners have invoked the extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners canvassed that they had been in possession in the plot in question and they had already requested the respondent-defendant No.1-Gram Panchayat Niwaru to issue a patta in their favour. The petitioners also sought the relief, apart issuing direction to Gram Panchayat Niwaru, to issue a patta, to restrain other persons also fr











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top