SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Raj) 697

PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Govind Singh – Appellant
Versus
Madan Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Shyam Babu Pareek, for Petitioner;
Gaurav Dave, for Respondents No.1 & 2;
Respondents No.3 to 5 not present

ekFkqj] lnL;-&gLrxr iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk jktLFkku dk'rdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 dh /kkjk 230 ds vUrxZr fo}ku Hkw izcU/k vf/kdkjh ,oa insu jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh >qa>quw }kjk vihy la[;k 15@2004 ¼enu flag o vU; cuke xksfoUn flag o vU;½ esa fnukad 6-11-2004 dks ikfjr fu.kZ; ds fo:) izLrqr dh x;h gSA

2- izdj.k ds lqlaxr rF; laf{kIr esa fuEu izdkj ls gSa fd izkFkhZ@oknh xksfoUnflag us vizkFkhZx.k@izfroknhx.k ds fo:) fo}ku mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] >qa>uwa ds le{k jktLFkku dk'rdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ds vUrxZr mn~?kks"k.kk] foHkktu ,oa fjdkWMZ nq:Lrh dk izLrqr fd;k tks okn fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; us fu.kZ; fnukad 22-9-1997 }kjk [kkfjt fd;k] ftl fu.kZ; ds fo:) izkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr izFke vihy fo}ku Hkw izcU/k vf/kdkjh ,oa insu jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] lhdj ds ,di{kh; fu.kZ; fnukad 26-6-2000 }kjk Lohdkj dh tkdj fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; ,oa fMØh fnukad 22-9-1997 [kkfjt fd;kA ftl ,di{kh; fu.kZ; fnukad 26-6-2000 ls O;fFkr gksdj vizkFkhZ la[;k 1 ,oa 2 us izFke vihyh; U;k;ky; ds le{k O;ogkj izfØ;k lafgrk ds vkns'k 41 fu;e 21 ds vUrxZr izkFkZuk i= izLrqr dj ,di{kh; fu.kZ; fnukad 22-6-2000 vikLr djus dh izkFkZuk dhA ftl izkFkZuk i= dks izFke vihyh; U;k;ky; us vkyksP; fu.kZ; fnukad 6-11-2004 }kjk Lohdkj dj ,di{kh










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top