SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Raj) 256

MAHESH BHAGWATI
Laxma Devi – Appellant
Versus
Chandra Prakash – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
S.R. Jatav and N.L. Verma, for Appellants;
Vinod Tyagi and Vinay Kumar, for Respondents

BHAGWATI, J.—Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment and award dated 12th August, 2005 whereby the learned Additional District Judge (Fast Track) No. 8, Jaipur City, Jaipur (Motor Accident Claims Tribunal) dismissed the claim petition filed by the appellant claimants against the respondents.

2. Having considered the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties and carefully scanned the impugned award, it is noticed that on 21st July, 2003, at about 8-9 PM, one Mini Bus bearing registration No. RJ 05 3158 went out of order and stopped in front of the shop of Raju. The driver and the conductor of the said Mini Bus endeavoured their best to start the vehicle, but their all efforts went in vain. In the meantime, another Mini Bus bearing registration No. RJ 14 P 3765 being driven by its driver suddenly appeared there and the driver of the stilled bus requested the driver of bus No. 3765 to assist him in getting the Mini Bus started. It is relevant to point out that the driver of the stilled bus No. 3158 was Heera Lal Bairwa. It is alleged that Heera Lal Bairwa was standing at the back of the still Mini Bus and the driver of Bus No. RJ 14 P 3765 pushed stilled Mini Bus from i







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top