SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Raj) 838

AFTAB ALAM, RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Siby George – Respondent


ALAM , J.—Leave granted.

2. The short question that arises for consideration in this appeal is when does the payment of compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter the Act) become due and consequently what is the point in time from which interest would be payable on the amount of compensation as provided under Sec. 4-A(3) of the Act.

3. In this case, the Commissioner for Workmen’s Compensation, Ernakulam, by his order dated November 26, 2008 in WCC No.67 of 2006 directed for payment of simple interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of the accident on July 12, 2006. The appellant’s appeal (MFA No.172 of 2009) against the order of the Commissioner was dismissed by the Kerala High Court by order dated July 22, 2009 as barred by limitation. Against the order of the High Court the appellant filed the special leave petition (giving rise to this appeal) in which notice was issued “limited to the interest”.

4. Mr. Mehra, learned counsel appearing for the appellant, submitted that the learned Commissioner was wrong in directing for payment of interest from the date of the accident and any interest on the amount of compensation would be payable only from the























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top