MAHESH BHAGWATI
Heera Lal – Appellant
Versus
Hemraj – Respondent
2. Learned counsel for the appellant has impugned the award only on the ground that the appellant Heera lal lost the job on account of his left hand being amputated. He was working in Railways on the post of Cabin Man. His monthly salary was Rs. 12,869/-, but the Tribunal deducted the amount of pension from the salary and further considered only 80% permanent disability for the purpose of computing the amount towards the loss of his future income. Learned counsel canvassed that firstly, the Tribunal deducted the amount of his pension, from the total salary and thereafter, considered only 80% permanent disability, whereas, the Tribunal ought to have considered 100% permanent disability keeping in view the nature of his injury and further, the fact that he lost his employment. H
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.